Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: USCIS Sets Final Fee Schedule to Build an Immigration Service for the 21st Century
VisaJourney.com > General Discussion Area > Immigration News and Discussion

WifeOHunkyJohn
QUOTE
Office of Communications
US Citizens and Immigration Service
May 29, 2007


Press Release

USCIS Sets Final Fee Schedule to Build an Immigration Service for the 21st Century

Public comments prompt reduction in fees for some families applying for adjustment of status, expands fee waiver and exemption eligibility, permits one free extension of approved orphan petitions

WASHINGTON— Following a comprehensive review of more than 3,900 public comments, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today a final fee structure that includes benefits for some families with children and also expands the availability of fee waivers and exemptions.

The rule, scheduled to be published in tomorrow’s Federal Register, sets fees for the processing of immigration benefit applications and petitions and includes some substantive revisions from the proposal published in February of this year while providing necessary funding for the agency to continue strengthening the security and integrity of the immigration system, improving customer service, and modernizing business operations for the 21st century.

“We proposed our new fee structure with the expectation of ongoing discussions with the public on this important issue,” said USCIS Director Emilio Gonzalez. “The volume and value of the comments we received has provided an opportunity to fine-tune our final fee structure that we believe is both fair to our customers and vital to our Nation as we continue to build a secure and efficient national immigration service.”

Key revisions in the final rule include a 25 percent reduction to the proposed filing fee for Form I-485 (Adjustment of Status to Permanent Resident) for children 14 years old or younger, translating to a $360 decrease from what was proposed for a family of two adults and two children filing together. The rule will also allow a one-time free extension of approved orphan petitions for prospective adoptive parents, and expands the availability of fee waivers for some adjustment of status cases that arise from asylum or other humanitarian categories, and certain juvenile immigrants. USCIS will also exempt “Special Immigrant – Juveniles” from the $375 filing fee for Form I-360 (Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or Special Immigrant). Finally, USCIS will be able to waive the $80 biometric fee, in addition to the application/petition fee, on an individual basis.

The final rule retains the fee exemption for T visas (Victims of Human Trafficking) and self-petitioners seeking immigrant classification under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) for humanitarian reasons, as well as an exemption for all refugee and asylum applicants. The final rule also allows USCIS to waive the filing fee for U.S. citizens seeking immigrant status for their alien spouses (K-3 visas) and will continue to waive fees for members of the U.S. Armed Forces applying for naturalization.

USCIS expects that the revenue from the new fee structure will lead to a 20 percent reduction in average application processing times by the end of fiscal year 2009, and will cut processing times by the end of fiscal year 2008 for four key application types: the I-90 (Renew / Replace Permanent Resident Card), I-140 (Immigration Petition for Alien Worker), the I-485, and the N-400 (Naturalization). These four application types represent one-third of all applications filed.

The new fee structure is effective on July 30, 2007, and is posted at www.uscis.gov. Applications or petitions postmarked or otherwise filed on or after that date must include the new fee. More information on the final rule is available in the accompanying Questions and Answers document and a chart explaining the fee schedule for applications and petitions.

– USCIS –
homesick_american
Meh *shrug*
Sid and Nancy
I 751 - Remove conditions on your Permanent Resident status - $ 545 (filing + biometric)

...I better start saving money right now...
VJ Troll
Good news. The fees need to be higher. Raise the bar for legal immigrants!
GaryC
While I am sorry to see the fee go up I am relieved to see that it will not go into effect until the end of July. I hit a few bumps in the road money-wise and had to delay filing the OAS until next month. Looks like I will be good to go.
athena_ny
QUOTE(Jewel12 @ May 29 2007, 07:22 PM) *
I 751 - Remove conditions on your Permanent Resident status - $ 545 (filing + biometric)

...I better start saving money right now...



Me too...oh well. At least we know ahead of time. biggrin.gif
mawilson
QUOTE(Jewel12 @ May 29 2007, 07:22 PM) *
I 751 - Remove conditions on your Permanent Resident status - $ 545 (filing + biometric)

...I better start saving money right now...

Wow, these things ain't cheap.

The funny thing is, the filing of this petition is not optional.

Cough up $545 or lose your status.
Sid and Nancy
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 29 2007, 05:13 PM) *
QUOTE(Jewel12 @ May 29 2007, 07:22 PM) *
I 751 - Remove conditions on your Permanent Resident status - $ 545 (filing + biometric)

...I better start saving money right now...

Wow, these things ain't cheap.

The funny thing is, the filing of this petition is not optional.

Cough up $545 or lose your status.

Yep sad.gif That's exactly why I'm not upset about the citizenship application getting more expensive - at least it's not mandatory. But this I-751 is just a killer.

Dan&Tiffany
It would just be lovely if these fees actually have some impact on speeding up the process. Pipe dreams, right?
LaL
it would be lovely if those of us who are royally stuck having to renew each year would be updated to give the interim benefits that are supposedly included in the new fees. we have already paid $1085 to AOS. in September we are slated to pay an additional $645 if we are not "updated".



fun stuff.

Lance27
I totally agree on that one... I would'nt mind paying extra if the service and wait times improved drastically.

QUOTE(Dan&Tiffany @ May 29 2007, 08:36 PM) *
It would just be lovely if these fees actually have some impact on speeding up the process. Pipe dreams, right?

garyandmarylou
QUOTE(Jewel12 @ May 29 2007, 06:22 PM) *
I 751 - Remove conditions on your Permanent Resident status - $ 545 (filing + biometric)

...I better start saving money right now...

I hear ya there
But like Mawilson said its not as if we have a choice mad.gif
Mr. Big Dog
QUOTE(WifeOHunkyJohn @ May 29 2007, 06:12 PM) *
QUOTE
Office of Communications
US Citizens and Immigration Service
May 29, 2007


Press Release

USCIS Sets Final Fee Schedule to Build an Immigration Service for the 21st Century
...
The new fee structure is effective on July 30, 2007,


QUOTE(Jewel12 @ May 29 2007, 06:22 PM) *
I 751 - Remove conditions on your Permanent Resident status - $ 545 (filing + biometric)

...I better start saving money right now...


Don't I feel lucky that we have the I-751 ready to go on June 16. tongue.gif

The $275.00 suddenly seems to be such a bargain. blink.gif
pixiegunn
This is an article from last night about the fee increase as of July 30...some hefty fees!...


Citizenship and green card fees to rise
Tue May 29, 7:01 PM ET
WASHINGTON - Immigration officials said Tuesday they will proceed with plans to double the cost of applying to become a U.S. citizen and triple the fee for seeking legal permanent residency.


The fee increases will take effect July 30. Citizenship fees will rise from $330 to $595, plus $80 for required electronic fingerprints, an increase of $10. For legal permanent residency and fingerprints the cost will be $1,010 for those over 14. The cost now is $325.

Officials with Citizenship and Immigration Services, a division of the Department of Homeland Security, said the increases are needed to improve service, hire 1,500 workers, improve offices, equipment and systems to process applications.

"This agency is fee based, 99 percent of our budget comes from user fees. We need to be the agency people expect us to be. We need to undertake reforms .... The only way to get from there to here is to have the financial resources to do that," CIS Director Emilio Gonzalez said Tuesday.

Many immigration groups and some Democratic members of Congress have protested the fee increases, saying they will put citizenship and legal immigration out of reach of many immigrants. They also question whether better service will follow.

The new fees were to be published this week in the Federal Register and also were posted on the CIS Web site.
Kez/JWolf
OH crap!!!!! I miss being able to file at the old rate for removal of conditions by just a few days.....

Kez
derekkj
QUOTE(Niagaenola @ May 30 2007, 08:45 AM) *
OH crap!!!!! I miss being able to file at the old rate for removal of conditions by just a few days.....

Kez


Oh, that sucks Kez! And I was feeling bad because we are missing it by just a few weeks. cray5ol.gif

You think they could grandfather those of us that are already in the system. Sigh. Oh, well, starting to save now!

Number 6
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 29 2007, 08:13 PM) *
QUOTE(Jewel12 @ May 29 2007, 07:22 PM) *
I 751 - Remove conditions on your Permanent Resident status - $ 545 (filing + biometric)

...I better start saving money right now...

Wow, these things ain't cheap.

The funny thing is, the filing of this petition is not optional.

Cough up $545 or lose your status.


Yeah - that's pretty obscene IMO. If you're struggling to keep above the poverty line (as the wife and I were when we first got married) - that's serious money. What is it at the moment - $275?
tom&tata
QUOTE(erekose @ May 30 2007, 09:04 AM) *
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 29 2007, 08:13 PM) *
QUOTE(Jewel12 @ May 29 2007, 07:22 PM) *
I 751 - Remove conditions on your Permanent Resident status - $ 545 (filing + biometric)

...I better start saving money right now...

Wow, these things ain't cheap.

The funny thing is, the filing of this petition is not optional.

Cough up $545 or lose your status.


Yeah - that's pretty obscene IMO. If you're struggling to keep above the poverty line (as the wife and I were when we first got married) - that's serious money. What is it at the moment - $275?


Think so. We don't have a choice but to pay (somewhere in Nov) but we seriously want to see the improvement in speed for doubling the fee.
Mr. Big Dog
QUOTE(tom&tata @ May 30 2007, 09:56 AM) *
QUOTE(erekose @ May 30 2007, 09:04 AM) *
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 29 2007, 08:13 PM) *
QUOTE(Jewel12 @ May 29 2007, 07:22 PM) *
I 751 - Remove conditions on your Permanent Resident status - $ 545 (filing + biometric)

...I better start saving money right now...
Wow, these things ain't cheap.

The funny thing is, the filing of this petition is not optional.

Cough up $545 or lose your status.
Yeah - that's pretty obscene IMO. If you're struggling to keep above the poverty line (as the wife and I were when we first got married) - that's serious money. What is it at the moment - $275?
Think so. We don't have a choice but to pay (somewhere in Nov) but we seriously want to see the improvement in speed for doubling the fee.

Yeah right. Good one. LOL
Number 6
I already paid the $275 - as it was I had to forgo some work that needed doing on the car to pay for it. Given the expenses involved in the various parts of the process (already over $1000), I resent having to pay a bunch more just for the right to continue going about daily life. It stinks.
GaryC
I have all these fees x2. It really sucks.
Number 6
QUOTE(Iniibig ko si Luz forever @ May 30 2007, 11:25 AM) *
I have all these fees x2. It really sucks.


It really does. Considering the excellent service you don't get.
Anna C.
QUOTE(erekose @ May 30 2007, 11:26 AM) *
QUOTE(Iniibig ko si Luz forever @ May 30 2007, 11:25 AM) *
I have all these fees x2. It really sucks.


It really does. Considering the excellent service you don't get.


And that service won't improve, I'm pretty sure!

They could save money by getting rid of their misinformation hotline. Or by hiring people who are able to read (we printed our application, so no handwriting, still, they got both our address and my name wrong). How drunk was the guy who entered our info in their system?
Number 6
At least now you can actually talk to an “immigration officer’ – which is what the supervisors seem to be. Still each time you’ve got to get around the incompetent first responders – who will give you different info to the supervisors.
eric&gen
The fee for the I 751 is not $275 anymore? That how much we paid in March. Wow
Anna C.
QUOTE(erekose @ May 30 2007, 11:56 AM) *
At least now you can actually talk to an “immigration officer’ – which is what the supervisors seem to be. Still each time you’ve got to get around the incompetent first responders – who will give you different info to the supervisors.



They never let me talk to someone else - even when we inquired to talk to their supervisor they hung up on us (he said: I'll transfer you, but essentially hung up!!!).
mawilson
QUOTE(Niagaenola @ May 30 2007, 08:45 AM) *
OH crap!!!!! I miss being able to file at the old rate for removal of conditions by just a few days.....

Kez

If it's just a few days, why don't you just mail it in a few days earlier?
Mr. Big Dog
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 12:06 PM) *
QUOTE(Niagaenola @ May 30 2007, 08:45 AM) *
OH crap!!!!! I miss being able to file at the old rate for removal of conditions by just a few days.....Kez
If it's just a few days, why don't you just mail it in a few days earlier?

I don't think they'll take it. Otherwise, people could (and perceivably would) start filing sooner. USCIS gives you a 90 day window within which you are required to file. They are typically not very flexible.
Jo1973
My GC expires on 20 Oct, so working out the 90 day thing I can file on 23 July, do you think I would be able to get away with the old charges? I sure hope so.
Kez/JWolf
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 12:06 PM) *
QUOTE(Niagaenola @ May 30 2007, 08:45 AM) *
OH crap!!!!! I miss being able to file at the old rate for removal of conditions by just a few days.....

Kez

If it's just a few days, why don't you just mail it in a few days earlier?


You can not file before the 90th day... or your application will be rejected.... they will only accept it once the 90 days window opens....

Kez
tom&tata
QUOTE(ET-US2004 @ May 30 2007, 10:06 AM) *
QUOTE(tom&tata @ May 30 2007, 09:56 AM) *
QUOTE(erekose @ May 30 2007, 09:04 AM) *
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 29 2007, 08:13 PM) *
QUOTE(Jewel12 @ May 29 2007, 07:22 PM) *
I 751 - Remove conditions on your Permanent Resident status - $ 545 (filing + biometric)

...I better start saving money right now...
Wow, these things ain't cheap.

The funny thing is, the filing of this petition is not optional.

Cough up $545 or lose your status.
Yeah - that's pretty obscene IMO. If you're struggling to keep above the poverty line (as the wife and I were when we first got married) - that's serious money. What is it at the moment - $275?
Think so. We don't have a choice but to pay (somewhere in Nov) but we seriously want to see the improvement in speed for doubling the fee.

Yeah right. Good one. LOL


One can hope laughing.gif
mawilson
QUOTE(ET-US2004 @ May 30 2007, 12:14 PM) *
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 12:06 PM) *
QUOTE(Niagaenola @ May 30 2007, 08:45 AM) *
OH crap!!!!! I miss being able to file at the old rate for removal of conditions by just a few days.....Kez
If it's just a few days, why don't you just mail it in a few days earlier?

I don't think they'll take it. Otherwise, people could (and perceivably would) start filing sooner. USCIS gives you a 90 day window within which you are required to file. They are typically not very flexible.

Right - but is your application considered submitted on the date it was received
or the date it was postmarked by USPS?

I imagine it's the postmark that counts, as it is with the IRS and other government
agencies.

Otherwise, if the fee increase takes effect July 30, and you post your application
July 27, how would you know which fee to pay?
rclouse
Whew! Just got in under the wire. Aicha had her biometrics for I-751 yesterday. smile.gif

Didn't they say last time they raised fees it was to improve service? I haven't noticed any improved service....
GaryC
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 11:28 AM) *
QUOTE(ET-US2004 @ May 30 2007, 12:14 PM) *
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 12:06 PM) *
QUOTE(Niagaenola @ May 30 2007, 08:45 AM) *
OH crap!!!!! I miss being able to file at the old rate for removal of conditions by just a few days.....Kez
If it's just a few days, why don't you just mail it in a few days earlier?

I don't think they'll take it. Otherwise, people could (and perceivably would) start filing sooner. USCIS gives you a 90 day window within which you are required to file. They are typically not very flexible.

Right - but is your application considered submitted on the date it was received
or the date it was postmarked by USPS?

I imagine it's the postmark that counts, as it is with the IRS and other government
agencies.

Otherwise, if the fee increase takes effect July 30, and you post your application
July 27, how would you know which fee to pay?

They go by the postmark.
QUOTE
The new fee structure is effective on July 30, 2007, and is posted at www.uscis.gov. Applications or petitions postmarked or otherwise filed on or after that date must include the new fee.

If your getting close I would take it to the post office and insist that they postmark it right there.
mawilson
QUOTE(rclouse @ May 30 2007, 12:40 PM) *
Whew! Just got in under the wire. Aicha had her biometrics for I-751 yesterday. smile.gif

Didn't they say last time they raised fees it was to improve service? I haven't noticed any improved service....

You haven't? I think they have improved tremendously.
mawilson
QUOTE(Iniibig ko si Luz forever @ May 30 2007, 12:43 PM) *
QUOTE
The new fee structure is effective on July 30, 2007, and is posted at www.uscis.gov. Applications or petitions postmarked or otherwise filed on or after that date must include the new fee.

If your getting close I would take it to the post office and insist that they postmark it right there.

If the difference is only a couple of days, I would postmark it before the cut-off date and
hope it arrives within the 90-day window.
eric&gen
N 400 is now going to $675 crap not fair this really sucks used to be $300 something. We better start saving now lol.
mawilson
QUOTE(eric&gen @ May 30 2007, 01:22 PM) *
N 400 is now going to $675 crap not fair this really sucks used to be $300 something. We better start saving now lol.

You can always sell your child into slavery.

Not an option for us -- no children.
Anna C.
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 01:24 PM) *
You can always sell your child into slavery.

Not an option for us -- no children.


Hm, a reason to think about having children... innocent.gif Maybe we can enslave the cat to work as exterminator, she really likes to eat spiders on the pattio.... Hm new business model... And completely organic! wink.gif
Robor007
Ya know these fee increases really suck. My wife is a K-3 so that means no workie until EAD. We should be able to get our AOS/EAD submitted before the increases but we'll still be stuck with the increased fees later for removing conditions and US citizenship (if we even bother). On top of that we've got to get her a car and teach her how to drive it before she can get a job and start earning an income.

I feel really bad for those just behind us who are going to have to pay full price for their I-129/I-130, I-485, etc. They'll be paying the increased fees but they're not going to see any improvement in service. That's months if not years down the road.
mawilson
QUOTE(Anna C. @ May 30 2007, 04:38 PM) *
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 01:24 PM) *
You can always sell your child into slavery.

Not an option for us -- no children.


Hm, a reason to think about having children... innocent.gif Maybe we can enslave the cat to work as exterminator, she really likes to eat spiders on the pattio.... Hm new business model... And completely organic! wink.gif

You could always enslave a bunch of hamsters and use them to generate energy for your home
without shelling out a dollar from your wallet..... oh wait, the little bastards need food, don't they?
Yodrak
rclouse,

I agree with mawilson on this - you must not have been paying much attention.

Yodrak

QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 12:45 PM) *
QUOTE(rclouse @ May 30 2007, 12:40 PM) *
.....

Didn't they say last time they raised fees it was to improve service? I haven't noticed any improved service....

You haven't? I think they have improved tremendously.
eric&gen
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 10:24 AM) *
QUOTE(eric&gen @ May 30 2007, 01:22 PM) *
N 400 is now going to $675 crap not fair this really sucks used to be $300 something. We better start saving now lol.

You can always sell your child into slavery.

Not an option for us -- no children.



Sorry but im not that hard up for money lol. jest.gif
BJZags
QUOTE(Robor007 @ May 30 2007, 04:51 PM) *
On top of that we've got to get her a car and teach her how to drive it before she can get a job and start earning an income.

Hmm . . . Some would say that common sense requires her to have a job that requires her to need a car before you plunk money into a car/insurance/driving lessons, etc. etc. We are in largely the same situation, but there is no way we can afford a second car until there is additional cash coming in for all the extra fees this would entail. My parents for decades had only one car, and they managed to get by.
Yodrak
mawilson,

Personal anecdote: My wife mailed her application for adjustment of status - it was postmarked - April 29, 2004, the day before the last fee increase for AOS went into effect. The submission was received by the SC on April 30, and the NOA1 (which was not a Receipt Notice!) - had a Receipt Date of May 3.

The submission was returned for incorrect fee, and the rejection notice attached to the returned submission stated that the submission could be resubmitted if we could demonstrate that a mistake had been made. The rejection notice also stated, very clearly, that submissions postmarked April 30 or later required the new, higher fee. I highlighted that line when my wife resubmitted. I also highlighted the April 29 postmark on the original mailing envelope (it had been sent back with the returned submission), and the April 29 date on the USPS Delivery Confirmation Receipt.

The submission was returned again for incorrect fee, with a fresh copy of the same notice stating that submissions postmarked April 30 or later required a new fee, and with the evidence that we had submitted showing a highlighted postmark of April 29.

Appealed on more time before giving up and paying the extra money.

My conclusion - while discussion of what counts on VJ can be fun and interesting, what counts is what the clerk who opens the submission package at the SC says counts.

Yodrak

QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 12:28 PM) *
QUOTE(ET-US2004 @ May 30 2007, 12:14 PM) *
QUOTE(mawilson @ May 30 2007, 12:06 PM) *
QUOTE(Niagaenola @ May 30 2007, 08:45 AM) *
OH crap!!!!! I miss being able to file at the old rate for removal of conditions by just a few days.....Kez
If it's just a few days, why don't you just mail it in a few days earlier?

I don't think they'll take it. Otherwise, people could (and perceivably would) start filing sooner. USCIS gives you a 90 day window within which you are required to file. They are typically not very flexible.

Right - but is your application considered submitted on the date it was received
or the date it was postmarked by USPS?

I imagine it's the postmark that counts, as it is with the IRS and other government
agencies.

Otherwise, if the fee increase takes effect July 30, and you post your application
July 27, how would you know which fee to pay?
mawilson
QUOTE(Yodrak @ May 31 2007, 09:28 AM) *
I also highlighted the April 29 postmark on the original mailing envelope (it had been sent back with the returned submission), and the April 29 date on the USPS Delivery Confirmation Receipt.

The submission was returned again for incorrect fee, with a fresh copy of the same notice stating that submissions postmarked April 30 or later required a new fee, and with the evidence that we had submitted showing a highlighted postmark of April 29.

Appealed on more time before giving up and paying the extra money.

I still think it's worth a shot. Worst case scenario, they'll just ask you to pay the new fee.

Yodrak - on a personal note, what they did to you was seriously WRONG. I think I would have
fought them on general principle (or perhaps paid the extra money and demanded a refund later.)
Yodrak
mawilson,

After the 3rd rejection my wife convinced me that getting the green card was more important than the principle involved. Wives have ways of convincing..... And going the next steps to argue the principle would have cost more that the fee differential to be saved.

I understand that at the same time the same problem was being had at the TSC, which unfortunately not my SC. The AILA got involved in that one, as it made the lawyers look bad with the SC sending back their client's applications. I believe that they had better success than I did.

Yodrak

QUOTE(mawilson @ May 31 2007, 12:22 PM) *
QUOTE(Yodrak @ May 31 2007, 09:28 AM) *
I also highlighted the April 29 postmark on the original mailing envelope (it had been sent back with the returned submission), and the April 29 date on the USPS Delivery Confirmation Receipt.

The submission was returned again for incorrect fee, with a fresh copy of the same notice stating that submissions postmarked April 30 or later required a new fee, and with the evidence that we had submitted showing a highlighted postmark of April 29.

Appealed on more time before giving up and paying the extra money.

I still think it's worth a shot. Worst case scenario, they'll just ask you to pay the new fee.

Yodrak - on a personal note, what they did to you was seriously WRONG. I think I would have
fought them on general principle (or perhaps paid the extra money and demanded a refund later.)
titotomas
QUOTE(Iniibig ko si Luz forever @ May 30 2007, 10:25 AM) *
I have all these fees x2. It really sucks.



Yeah, me too times two... *sigh* Guess they (USCIS) figures it's worth it to US to keep the people we love, so we'll pay it. Guess they have to find some way to pay for the program changes they are proposing as well.... which I feel are a slap in the face to all the rest of us who "jumped through all their hoops".... mad.gif (Sorry Ewok, don't mean to get political...I'll be quiet now whistling.gif )
titotomas
Yodrak....call your U.S. Senator...right now. He/she will have someone in the office DEDICATED to ironing out these kind of problems (been there, done that). Congress is the watchdog. No bad reflection on you, either.

QUOTE(eric&gen @ May 30 2007, 12:22 PM) *
N 400 is now going to $675 crap not fair this really sucks used to be $300 something. We better start saving now lol.

Ouch! unsure.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.