QUOTE(saywhat @ May 16 2007, 02:23 AM)

Summary - Basically they have lots of stuff they can refuse you on if they think you will infect the herd or cost em money - or they can use these excuses if they don't like your politics just like they put al capone in alcatraz for tax evasion....
No; it's not like that at all. Infectious diseases do present public health problems, so we're well within our rights to keep people like that out of the USA until they're no longer a threat to public health. Judging from some of the comments from Europeans here who now live in the USA, I don't think they use left-wing politics to keep people out.

QUOTE
It's amazing that the UK let my USC wife into the UK as a resident with a 10 minute interview in chicago and no health check, even though the UK is a haven of healthy people compared to the US with it's AIDS problems and millions in jail....
Eh...have you seen the spiraling rates of TB in the UK? Also, immigrants (regardless of status) and visitors cost the NHS millions of pounds every year. The UK absolutely should do health checks on immigrants. That it doesn't is completely insane. Also, having lived in the UK for six years I strongly disagree that it's a haven of healthy people. That simply isn't true. It has some of the worst cancer survival rates in Europe and is often worse than the USA with its big bad private healthcare system. Diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, etc. are all epidemic here...and the UK is worse than the USA in terms of diseases caused by alcohol. Healthy? Hardly. Right now I'd say overall it is marginally better than the USA, and that's WITH universal, free-at-the-point-of-use healthcare. Clearly, the NHS needs to do better!
QUOTE
Anyway, isn't it all irrelevant when foreigners can enter the USA (and it's citizens) as visitors for months at a time and do all the infecting and mental rampaging they want without any prior health checks...(and become a public charge if they have no insurance or money)
*shrug* You'd have to ask the government about that one. You couldn't require a £200 health check for every tourist. Nobody would ever visit. They have to balance economic considerations against public health considerations. I suppose this is why immigrants get medical exams and tourists don't.
QUOTE
I suppose these regulations were drawn up before the jet age when people didn't pop in and out on visits...
I'd be surprised if they were not revised within the last five years.
QUOTE
ok so the answer is that they can stop you if you are infectious and they can stop you if you are dangerously nuts and they can stop you if have a health condition unless you are very rich and can afford to be sick without becoming a public charge - and then they can't.
Please, let's not be overly dramatic.
They CAN flunk you on the medical. That doesn't mean that they WILL. People rarely fail the medical exam; if you're going to be denied a visa, it's almost always for something else.
If your BP is 300/200, they very well may deny you. If it's 150/100, you'll most likely be fine...or they may ask your GP to write to them with an explanation. If you have a history of depression, you'll be asked for a letter. If you're a paranoid schizophrenic with violent tendencies, count on being denied. If you have stage 4 cancer, count on a denial. If you go in there high on coke, count on being denied.
The point I'm trying to make (because I'm very pedantic, it's because I'm an Aspie) is that they can deny you for more than just infectious diseases or mental disorders. I'm not saying you're going to be denied, though if you shared more info with us I'm sure people here could give you a better idea of what your chances are. If you're just an overweight biker, I would not worry.