QUOTE(MPGGPM @ Apr 8 2007, 05:32 PM)

QUOTE(jasonbrus @ Apr 8 2007, 06:17 PM)

speaking as a person who favors "love marriage", i must say, if the duration of the marriage is a measurement of success (as we may have different determinants as to how xuccessful a marriage is), then "love marriage" certainly is not the way to do it. fact is, over 60% of this so called "love marriage" will be terminated (aka divorce) within 5-7 yrs and the second timer's success ration is not high also. however, the love is certainly a lot of fun. so, like my playboy buddy Big Al once said, Love is fun but love intensively and get the hell out of there quick. LOL.
Your data and response is flawed, because you didn't give the numbers for the marriages that were founded on being "arranged".
If the so called 'love" marriages have a failure rate of 60%, then I can only imagine that the "arranged" marriages , where the couples most likely did not even love each other, would be MUCH worse.
Hard to agree with your argument, when you do not even give the alternative data.
Obviously, Indian or not..........and taking into account the feelings I have for my own wife..................................I strongly take exception to your argument. ......................and prefer the "former"....rather than the "latter"

QUOTE(MPGGPM @ Apr 8 2007, 05:32 PM)

QUOTE(jasonbrus @ Apr 8 2007, 06:17 PM)

speaking as a person who favors "love marriage", i must say, if the duration of the marriage is a measurement of success (as we may have different determinants as to how xuccessful a marriage is), then "love marriage" certainly is not the way to do it. fact is, over 60% of this so called "love marriage" will be terminated (aka divorce) within 5-7 yrs and the second timer's success ration is not high also. however, the love is certainly a lot of fun. so, like my playboy buddy Big Al once said, Love is fun but love intensively and get the hell out of there quick. LOL.
Your data and response is flawed, because you didn't give the numbers for the marriages that were founded on being "arranged".
If the so called 'love" marriages have a failure rate of 60%, then I can only imagine that the "arranged" marriages , where the couples most likely did not even love each other, would be MUCH worse.
Hard to agree with your argument, when you do not even give the alternative data.
Obviously, Indian or not..........and taking into account the feelings I have for my own wife..................................I strongly take exception to your argument. ......................and prefer the "former"....rather than the "latter"

QUOTE(MPGGPM @ Apr 8 2007, 05:32 PM)

QUOTE(jasonbrus @ Apr 8 2007, 06:17 PM)

speaking as a person who favors "love marriage", i must say, if the duration of the marriage is a measurement of success (as we may have different determinants as to how xuccessful a marriage is), then "love marriage" certainly is not the way to do it. fact is, over 60% of this so called "love marriage" will be terminated (aka divorce) within 5-7 yrs and the second timer's success ration is not high also. however, the love is certainly a lot of fun. so, like my playboy buddy Big Al once said, Love is fun but love intensively and get the hell out of there quick. LOL.
Your data and response is flawed, because you didn't give the numbers for the marriages that were founded on being "arranged".
If the so called 'love" marriages have a failure rate of 60%, then I can only imagine that the "arranged" marriages , where the couples most likely did not even love each other, would be MUCH worse.
Hard to agree with your argument, when you do not even give the alternative data.
Obviously, Indian or not..........and taking into account the feelings I have for my own wife..................................I strongly take exception to your argument. ......................and prefer the "former"....rather than the "latter"

QUOTE(MPGGPM @ Apr 8 2007, 05:32 PM)

QUOTE(jasonbrus @ Apr 8 2007, 06:17 PM)

speaking as a person who favors "love marriage", i must say, if the duration of the marriage is a measurement of success (as we may have different determinants as to how xuccessful a marriage is), then "love marriage" certainly is not the way to do it. fact is, over 60% of this so called "love marriage" will be terminated (aka divorce) within 5-7 yrs and the second timer's success ration is not high also. however, the love is certainly a lot of fun. so, like my playboy buddy Big Al once said, Love is fun but love intensively and get the hell out of there quick. LOL.
Your data and response is flawed, because you didn't give the numbers for the marriages that were founded on being "arranged".
If the so called 'love" marriages have a failure rate of 60%, then I can only imagine that the "arranged" marriages , where the couples most likely did not even love each other, would be MUCH worse.
Hard to agree with your argument, when you do not even give the alternative data.
Obviously, Indian or not..........and taking into account the feelings I have for my own wife..................................I strongly take exception to your argument. ......................and prefer the "former"....rather than the "latter"

nice one i m with u for this one