QUOTE(Paula&Minya @ Mar 31 2007, 08:10 PM)

The reason the English and Canadians (& all those people from countries that are part of the Visa Waiver Program) are allowed to come here freely w/o a visa is because they do not have a history of overstaying their visas....NOT because of coke, Chiquita or Exxon or whatever.
No, actually, you are incorrect. Visa overstays are nowhere near the most significant factor.
There's a whole lot more in the equation, i.e. extradition treaties, reciprocity, authenticity of passports, etc..
Please see
http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/temp/with...thout_1255.html for details on what makes countries eligible for the Visa Waiver Program.
Clearly indicated under "types of issues considered" is:
* Existence of security and law enforcement threats in the country (terrorist activities, organized crime, money laundering, human and drug trafficking, etc.)
Which most certainly applies to FARC/AUC/ELN and their drug running.
Chiquita exacerbates the problem by financially supporting these terrorist groups and death squads.
Read all about it here:
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/story/2007/3/17/231647/347Get your facts straight, k?
QUOTE(Paula&Minya @ Mar 31 2007, 08:10 PM)

But small newsflash for you...if you are pursuing a K-1 visa without being sure that the woman you're bringing here is the woman you are going to marry you are in effect lying on that visa application....which may constitute fraud!
Err... this statement is just confusing, and is about the most liberal definition of fraud I've ever heard of. I'll take my chances.
QUOTE(Paula&Minya @ Mar 31 2007, 08:10 PM)

No offense taken...but read through the personal stories of some of the members here on VJ....10.5 months is the least amount of time some of them have been separated from their loved one, and they've been able to make it work.
Oh certainly, already have. I'm not new to forums in general, I know how to lurk. But let it suffice to say this approach will not work for me, and leave it at that.
QUOTE(Paula&Minya @ Mar 31 2007, 08:10 PM)

How could you even think about not including the child (unless he/she is over the age of 18) in the petition? A child must go with the mother, unless there are circumstances we are not aware of.
Again, you are incorrect. You need to READ more, rather than trying to present your opinions as fact.
Maybe you should actually read the very site you post on!
http://www.visajourney.com/faq/k1k2visa-I129f.html"If your fiance(e) has unmarried children under 21, they can move to the US also. List all children under age 21 on the I-129F petition, whether or not they are going to move to the United States. When this petition is approved, the fiance(e) can apply for the K1/K2 visa."
See those words, "if", "can", and "whether or not"? Are you unable to infer the meaning?
And WRT me not including the child- get off your high moral horse, please. I never said I was seeking to leave her child behind, in fact everything I've written thus far (including the question in the OP!) points directly to the contrary.
@ Boiler: Thanks for the suggestion, but visitor visas from Colombia are nearly impossible to obtain. The applicant must demonstrate proof of significant financial, career and family ties. A bank manager w/significant salary and who owns his own home would have a tough time getting one. Apologies for running two threads, I misposted and well, both seemed to blow up before I could delete one.