Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: What is the difference between I-134 and I-864?
VisaJourney.com > Marriage Based Immigration (K1, K2, K3, etc) to the USA > The Foreign Embassy and Consulate General Discussion

charles_ny

What is the difference between I-134 and I-864?

And, which one should be filed to USCIS for K1 visa?

Thanks in advance!
pulteseller
I134 is used for K1 visa, at least those going through the US Embassy in Bangkok. It is requested later in the process, when packet 3 is issued. Check your fiance/spouse's Embassy web page.
Yodrak
charles_ny,

Neither. The consulate, not USCIS, is likely to want an I-134 to go along with a K1 visa application.

Yodrak

QUOTE(charles_ny @ Mar 24 2007, 07:17 PM) *
What is the difference between I-134 and I-864?

And, which one should be filed to USCIS for K1 visa?

Thanks in advance!
GrenadianCrix
QUOTE(charles_ny @ Mar 24 2007, 06:17 PM) *
What is the difference between I-134 and I-864?

And, which one should be filed to USCIS for K1 visa?

Thanks in advance!



The I-134 is not a legally binding affidavit, it is used for non-immigrant visa's. Up until you marry (and subsequently file for Adjustment of status) the non-USC fiance will hold a non-immigrant visa. This allows them to get into the US before having a legal relationship with the USC fiance. The I-134 will need to be filled out by a qualified sponsor (the USC if he/she doesn't earn enough $ then also a co-sponsor) This form will need to be notarized. This does not get sent with the I-129F application. This is only submitted to the Embassy during the interview. Each Embassy will have information on this and will send it to you soon after your approved I-129F is forwarded to them.

The I-864 is a legally binding contract that the sponsor will be financially responsible for the immigrant in the event the immigrant attempts to benefit from certain federal aid programs. This form is filed at the Adjusment of Status part of the journey (after the Non-USC has travelled to the States and you two get married). I believe the new forms do not need to be notarized (check this) as they are already legally binding.
Hope this helps!
Sue
Turboguy
Sue is 100% correct. I have been through this process before an the I-134 is provided at the time of the interview. It never needs to acompany the initial filing. The rest of Sues response is also totally correct.
GrenadianCrix
QUOTE(Turboguy @ Mar 24 2007, 08:13 PM) *
Sue is 100% correct. I have been through this process before an the I-134 is provided at the time of the interview. It never needs to acompany the initial filing. The rest of Sues response is also totally correct.



Thanks TurboGuy!
Can you send that to my fiance and let him know that I am "Totally Correct"?
It's a momentus occassion, it doesn't happen very often...Thanks for the ego boost...I'll try to not let it get to my head....lol
laughing.gif laughing.gif laughing.gif laughing.gif
Sue
flutter95
Also - The I-864 does NOT have to be notarized, your correct....AGAIN! laughing.gif
CutienPurg
Hate to be the bearer of the " you weren't 100% correct " news but there is not a co-sponsor with the I-134. There is a single sponsor......if not the petitioner then it is someone else who qualifies. Otherwise you did great Sue good.gif
GrenadianCrix
QUOTE(CutienPurg @ Mar 25 2007, 10:59 AM) *
Hate to be the bearer of the " you weren't 100% correct " news but there is not a co-sponsor with the I-134. There is a single sponsor......if not the petitioner then it is someone else who qualifies. Otherwise you did great Sue good.gif


I used the term co-sponsor from the I-864 for simplicity. However, the petitioning fiance still needs to fill out a I-134 for their own financial situation regardless if they can sponsor the non-USC themselves. If you need to use "someone else who qualifies" it doesn't matter what language you use for yourself, you just need to make sure both of you file the I-134. But I will stand corrected.
Sue
meauxna
QUOTE(GrenadianCrix @ Mar 25 2007, 09:15 AM) *
QUOTE(CutienPurg @ Mar 25 2007, 10:59 AM) *
Hate to be the bearer of the " you weren't 100% correct " news but there is not a co-sponsor with the I-134. There is a single sponsor......if not the petitioner then it is someone else who qualifies. Otherwise you did great Sue good.gif


I used the term co-sponsor from the I-864 for simplicity.


But there is no 'co sponsor' with the I-864 either. There is a Joint Sponsor....


devil.gif
Being Totally Correct is a PITA. wink.gif
GrenadianCrix
you guys sure do suck the fun out of things
Yodrak
Sue,

Some of us aren't here for fun, we're here to help people have a correct understanding of what they're doing.

Yodrak

QUOTE(GrenadianCrix @ Mar 25 2007, 01:35 PM) *
you guys sure do suck the fun out of things
Yodrak
Sue,

Not necessarily. Only if the consular officer asks for it. Some may, some may not.
- It is not required that the petitioner be the sponsor for a K visa
- It is not required that a sponsor for a K visa provide an I-134 (optional at the consular officer's discretion)

Yodrak

QUOTE(GrenadianCrix @ Mar 25 2007, 12:15 PM) *
..... the petitioning fiance still needs to fill out a I-134 for their own financial situation regardless if they can sponsor the non-USC themselves. If you need to use "someone else who qualifies" it doesn't matter what language you use for yourself, you just need to make sure both of you file the I-134. But I will stand corrected.
Sue
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.