Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Embassy's will no longer accept I-130
VisaJourney.com > Marriage Based Immigration (K1, K2, K3, etc) to the USA > Direct Consular Filing (DCF) General Discussion

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Fofire
I have read the whole 20 page thread but my brain is too fried to remember everything so I may have missed it. Aside from calling the Embassy directly, is there any place on the net where we can get the most up to date info with regards to if we will be able to submit an I-130 at a USCIS post if we do not live in that Territory. For instance I live in Romania and it falls under Vienna's territory. Currently Im not allowed to file my petition in Austria unless I actually live in Austria. From what I understand they are currently discussing whether they will expand that or not so that persons living in its entire jursidiction will be able to apply there as well.. Does anyone know where that type of news would be announce. And when I say that I mean a specific page or section and not a generic site like www.uscis.gov , because www.uscis.gov is hard enough to navigate through.

Thanks

aznsamiam
The best bet in checking whether or not you are eligible to file with a certain embassy would be to check that embassy's website and either contact them through email or phone. They should also have instructions on what to do if you are an american citizen residing in their jurisdiction and wishing to marry. I know that for Seoul, they have a whole section for American citizens wanting to marry Korean citizens (with separate sections for marrying in the States or Korea)

There are definitely certain requirements that make you a "resident" of that country. You should check to see whether or not you are considered a resident depending on your status with the country's immigration service. I don't know how they do it in Romania, but in Korea, if you stay here for longer than 90 days, you are required to register yourself as an "alien resident", which changes your status from "visitor" to "resident". If you've been staying in Romania for a long period of time, you should check to see whether or not you're considered a resident by now.

so to make matters short, just contact the embassy itself. Phone is probably the best way, but fax, email, and snail mail also works as well
saywhat
QUOTE(aussiewench @ Jan 27 2007, 05:45 AM) *
QUOTE(Hannah07 @ Jan 27 2007, 12:38 AM) *
QUOTE(blueblue @ Jan 27 2007, 06:03 PM) *
QUOTE(Hannah07 @ Jan 26 2007, 11:53 PM) *
you people are always such a ray of sunshine.

i dont see why i couldnt visit for the 6 months, then when the 6 months is up, return to New Zealand (while the process is completed) and then re-enter on the spouse visa.
i just want to be able to actually be with my husband and not have to be apart for months and months again.
we hadnt expected this, so its somewhat traumatic.
im just exploring all the options right now.

i dont understand your point about the POE.
explain?


Hannah,
Entering on the VWP if you are married to a US citizen is almost impossible. They will expect immigrant intent and you would most likely be denied entry. You are certainly free to try it, as long as you are honest in answering any questions so as not to trigger a misrepresentation accusation. Bring lots of evidence you plan to return to NZ, like your lease you are paying on or deed to your house, your job, bank accounts there, etc. But even with that, especially if you have filed the I-130 or I-129F, chances are very slim. I don't believe there are any repercussions of a denial at POE other than the possible cost and time wasted. I'm sure someone will correct me if there are any other downsides I left out.

Good luck.



im not good with the abbreviations. VWP?
thank you for your reply. this is helpful.
i figured id go to the U.S with my husband (using the airfares wed already paid for, etc) and wed file the I-130 when we got there.
then while that was sorting itself out, we could at least be together for a bit....enjoy being married and such.

i hadnt thought about the whole...being married to him already part.
ugh....this is so horrible.

VWP = Visa Waiver Program
As a newzealander you don't require a visa to enter the US.

I do disagree with blueblue about it being almost impossible to enter the US when married to a USC. Plenty do it. Yes some are denied. Its up to the CBP officer as to whether you are granted entry.


as always I agree with aussiewench - I entered with visa waiver 2 months after abandoning AOS - piece of cake man - just explain whats happening truthfully and convincingly and show all your return tickets and anything else - I reckon the POE folk don't want all the messing around with a refusal and if you can give em paperwork to cover their bottoms - they want to stamp your passport in... I would if I was a POE - wouldn't you ?

alan
David A.
More news from Sydney Consulate.

I emailed them asking what will happen to my I-130 since my wife has already had her final interview. They told her at her interview that they will be sending my I-130 to Bangkok. Well, the email that I just got from them states that they haven't even recieved instruction from the Department of State. So what am I to think? Did they just want my wife to go ahead with her final interview so they can take her 400$ and throw us to the curb? I'll keep doing some research, if that's the case, that's poor practice and I'll definitely pass that down to the Department of State. If they haven't even gotten instruction, why did they go ahead and take my wife's money?
marcycat
QUOTE(David A. @ Feb 5 2007, 08:50 PM) *
More news from Sydney Consulate.

I emailed them asking what will happen to my I-130 since my wife has already had her final interview. They told her at her interview that they will be sending my I-130 to Bangkok. Well, the email that I just got from them states that they haven't even recieved instruction from the Department of State. So what am I to think? Did they just want my wife to go ahead with her final interview so they can take her 400$ and throw us to the curb? I'll keep doing some research, if that's the case, that's poor practice and I'll definitely pass that down to the Department of State. If they haven't even gotten instruction, why did they go ahead and take my wife's money?


That's frustrating, but maybe not surprising. I've also heard from the Paris consulate that they're still unclear on exactly how to proceed. It sounds like others have heard similar uncertainty from their consulates. I'm guessing that when things are straightened out, your wife will receive her visa, and at least won't have to wait for a new interview date. I still recommend calling your elected officials, both to complain and to get help. Mine have at least been able to contact people at the Paris consulate whom I can't.
meauxna
QUOTE(David A. @ Feb 5 2007, 06:50 PM) *
More news from Sydney Consulate.

I emailed them asking what will happen to my I-130 since my wife has already had her final interview. They told her at her interview that they will be sending my I-130 to Bangkok. Well, the email that I just got from them states that they haven't even recieved instruction from the Department of State. So what am I to think? Did they just want my wife to go ahead with her final interview so they can take her 400$ and throw us to the curb? I'll keep doing some research, if that's the case, that's poor practice and I'll definitely pass that down to the Department of State. If they haven't even gotten instruction, why did they go ahead and take my wife's money?

What if you contacted Bangkok and asked if they have your I-130?

That's a sort of ambiguous reply from them. They're not going to kick you to the curb and keep your money.. don't worry about that, really. smile.gif
Darryl
Hi all,

I am new to this so sorry if I seem un-informed. I've bene reading through the K3 visa section and thought I fell under that blanket. I was just told I am part of the DCF side of things and that there are some law changes lately that could affect my case. Here is our story - could anyone offer some information as to what has transpired and if Canada immigration to the US via a USC spouse?

This summer I got married to my girlfriend who is a dual citizen (Canadian/American). We went to the consulate in Toronto and filled out all the paperwork and submitted the petition. We were sent the case # and a checklist of all documentation we had to obtain - we gathered all the documentation and send the checklist back (couriered it). So now we're waiting for the Montreal interview to be scheduled and nothing has happened. We sent the checklist back in mid-October 2006 and it is not mid-February 2007. I called the Visa office in Montreal back in December to make sure they got the checklist (they did on October 23rd) and to find out when we might hear back - the guy on the phone said it would 'probably' be January when we'd receive the letter with the interview date and the interview should be in February. We still haven't heard anything about the interview. Does anyone know how long this usually takes? We are left hanging with our lives kind of in limbo...My wife wants to move to the US for family reasons, my company wants to move me to the US for a promotion...but none of this can happen until we get the interview.

Also - what happens during the interview? I've read somewhere that there is a medical evaluation? Is the interview a long process? Once its done when do you get the Visa? When could we move to the US?


So this is our current situation -all documentation has been submitted but no interview has been scheduled. Do anyone know what the next step is or if we are affected by these new law changes?

Thanks a ton everyone, this board is really helping us understand the process and that its "not just us" that is going through these issues

Thanks

Darryl
payxibka
QUOTE(Darryl @ Feb 9 2007, 11:49 AM) *
Hi all,

I am new to this so sorry if I seem un-informed. I've bene reading through the K3 visa section and thought I fell under that blanket. I was just told I am part of the DCF side of things and that there are some law changes lately that could affect my case. Here is our story - could anyone offer some information as to what has transpired and if Canada immigration to the US via a USC spouse?

This summer I got married to my girlfriend who is a dual citizen (Canadian/American). We went to the consulate in Toronto and filled out all the paperwork and submitted the petition. We were sent the case # and a checklist of all documentation we had to obtain - we gathered all the documentation and send the checklist back (couriered it). So now we're waiting for the Montreal interview to be scheduled and nothing has happened. We sent the checklist back in mid-October 2006 and it is not mid-February 2007. I called the Visa office in Montreal back in December to make sure they got the checklist (they did on October 23rd) and to find out when we might hear back - the guy on the phone said it would 'probably' be January when we'd receive the letter with the interview date and the interview should be in February. We still haven't heard anything about the interview. Does anyone know how long this usually takes? We are left hanging with our lives kind of in limbo...My wife wants to move to the US for family reasons, my company wants to move me to the US for a promotion...but none of this can happen until we get the interview.

Also - what happens during the interview? I've read somewhere that there is a medical evaluation? Is the interview a long process? Once its done when do you get the Visa? When could we move to the US?


So this is our current situation -all documentation has been submitted but no interview has been scheduled. Do anyone know what the next step is or if we are affected by these new law changes?

Thanks a ton everyone, this board is really helping us understand the process and that its "not just us" that is going through these issues

Thanks

Darryl


All petitions still in process that were filed after July 26, 2006 are affected by the new law.
Darryl
So do you know what will happen to our petition and how long it might take to get the interview?

Thanks for your reply
maiki
Hello, all,

My approved petition in Tokyo got caught in the re-approval net. No updates in 2 weeks on the Tokyo embassy site, (they charge $16 for a 15 min. phone call and $13 to answer one email.) so I I'm very grateful for a forum like this.

I greatly appreciate and respect everyone who posts on this forum, especially the veterans like fwaguy and meauxna who selflessly answer our questions and post info.

I'd like to explain my position as a DFCer. I wholeheartedly agree that we shouldn't expect we have any rights to the fast-track we've had access to up until now. And I'm well aware that it's not wise to make any big life changes before a visa is actually issued.

But unfortunately reality forces many of us to do otherwise. People like me who had petitions approved were looking at very clear upcoming dates for getting our visas. I'm transplanting my whole family (I, my wife and 2 kids). That's no easy move. I have to start making arrangements months before I intend to leave. That has severe consequences for my employment, income and housing situation. I completely understand that we have no right to complain about being put in the same line as everyone else or to think DFC is a God given constitutional right. Conversely, I hope everyone understands what it means to go from "visa within a month" to "indefinite delay" for those of us who, by necessity, had to start making irreversible plans.
maiki
I can't seem to edit my post, so please excuse the DFC mistake for DCF whistling.gif
Fofire

"I'd like to explain my position as a DFCer. I wholeheartedly agree that we shouldn't expect we have any rights to the fast-track we've had access to up until now. And I'm well aware that it's not wise to make any big life changes before a visa is actually issued. "

When you say that I think that you are overlooking the fact that there are a lot of us that live in lesser countries developed countries where if I have to do this whole thing via America it will be a nightmare. I cant trust the post here in Romania to deliver me anything so how can I trust them with extremely important documents. For that matter if I want to mail anything internationally here I have to wait til the 2nd tuesday of the month to go to the post office unless I wanna make the trek down to Bucharest. To receive international packages I can pick them up twice a week.

I dont think that DCF should be considered a right but at the same time I think we have a right to demand a higher standard and for our needs to be taken into considerstion. If for instance we lived in America the way I have to with the post office here nothing would ever get done. Think of being able to mail stuff internationally once a week and be able to receive packages twice a week.

I am sure that the other folks that live in former communist countries and probably in other developing countriess will understand these remarks.
iluvmymac
QUOTE(maiki @ Feb 10 2007, 09:07 PM) *
Hello, all,

My approved petition in Tokyo got caught in the re-approval net. No updates in 2 weeks on the Tokyo embassy site, (they charge $16 for a 15 min. phone call and $13 to answer one email.) so I I'm very grateful for a forum like this.

I greatly appreciate and respect everyone who posts on this forum, especially the veterans like fwaguy and meauxna who selflessly answer our questions and post info.

I'd like to explain my position as a DFCer. I wholeheartedly agree that we shouldn't expect we have any rights to the fast-track we've had access to up until now. And I'm well aware that it's not wise to make any big life changes before a visa is actually issued.

But unfortunately reality forces many of us to do otherwise. People like me who had petitions approved were looking at very clear upcoming dates for getting our visas. I'm transplanting my whole family (I, my wife and 2 kids). That's no easy move. I have to start making arrangements months before I intend to leave. That has severe consequences for my employment, income and housing situation. I completely understand that we have no right to complain about being put in the same line as everyone else or to think DFC is a God given constitutional right. Conversely, I hope everyone understands what it means to go from "visa within a month" to "indefinite delay" for those of us who, by necessity, had to start making irreversible plans.


Hello, Maiki. It's nice to see a fellow Japan resident here. My wife and I had been preparing since December for filing our I-130, and mid-January had received an embassy appointment for March 5th. As we were in the process of putting our stuff together, we got the e-mail from the embassy on January 25th that our appointment was cancelled. We decided to go ahead and send our package to California because we had already made plans as you mentioned. My teaching job here finishes at the end of March since that is the end of the Japanese school year, so we need to move back to the US. So I will be going back in April ahead of my wife and daughter to look for a job and housing. They will stay until the visa comes, hopefully not later than August (in time for the new school year)

As it is now we have no idea how long it will take for my wife to get her visa. It's still unclear what the process will be, i.e. will USCIS send the approved petition to NVC or will they send it to the Tokyo embassy for the remainder of what was formally known as DCF.

I don't know about you, but I'm really mad about their e-mail/telephone inquiry service. I don't know of any other embassy that does this; from what I've read on these forums, other embassies seem to be friendly and have an open system where you can send them an e-mail anytime about anything.

yoroshiku

John in Machida
Fofire
QUOTE(maiki @ Feb 10 2007, 02:07 PM) *
Hello, all,

My approved petition in Tokyo got caught in the re-approval net. No updates in 2 weeks on the Tokyo embassy site, (they charge $16 for a 15 min. phone call and $13 to answer one email.) so I I'm very grateful for a forum like this.

I greatly appreciate and respect everyone who posts on this forum, especially the veterans like fwaguy and meauxna who selflessly answer our questions and post info.

I'd like to explain my position as a DFCer. I wholeheartedly agree that we shouldn't expect we have any rights to the fast-track we've had access to up until now. And I'm well aware that it's not wise to make any big life changes before a visa is actually issued.

But unfortunately reality forces many of us to do otherwise. People like me who had petitions approved were looking at very clear upcoming dates for getting our visas. I'm transplanting my whole family (I, my wife and 2 kids). That's no easy move. I have to start making arrangements months before I intend to leave. That has severe consequences for my employment, income and housing situation. I completely understand that we have no right to complain about being put in the same line as everyone else or to think DFC is a God given constitutional right. Conversely, I hope everyone understands what it means to go from "visa within a month" to "indefinite delay" for those of us who, by necessity, had to start making irreversible plans.



Oh yeah I wanted to add:

after all not demanding higher standards is one of the main reasons why the communist system failed.
maiki
QUOTE(iluvmymac @ Feb 10 2007, 09:00 AM) *
I don't know about you, but I'm really mad about their e-mail/telephone inquiry service. I don't know of any other embassy that does this; from what I've read on these forums, other embassies seem to be friendly and have an open system where you can send them an e-mail anytime about anything.


Agreed. I'm very displeased with the Tokyo embassy, too. How they would charge us just to answer inquiries while other embassies do this for free is beyond me. Like you a huge chunk of my work ends in March. We most likely would've gotten the visa by then, but now I'll be hard pressed to set up some temporary income during this indefinite delay. I originally planned to go back ahead of my family like you are, but circumstances prevented that. Good luck to you, John, and your family.
ufc_cat
I agree with Maiki, it sucks living in Japan and they wont help or answer basic questions unless you pay almost 20 bucks..I live in osaka where we have a US consulate and they wont help you if you any immigrant visa question.They would say call tokyo but they dont tell you there is a fee. Plus, i have to go to tokyo for my interview so thats an extra 200 bucks.

maiki
Yeah, all in all with transportation for interviews, fees, medical exam, paperwork expenses ... I figure we'll have spent more than $1500 by the time we get the visa.
maiki
Just got this form letter email reply to my inquiries from the Tokyo embassy:

"Thank you for using the U.S. Embassy Visa Information Service.

Please allow us to inform you as follows:

Due to the recently passed Adam Walsh Act, there has been significant
changes in the I-130 procedures for American citizens resident abroad.

1) Where has the petition been sent for re-approval and when was it sent?
If petition is still in Tokyo, when will it be sent and where? (Bangkok,
California, etc.?)

Your petition which was initially approved by consular services was
forwarded with top priority to the appropriate USCIS office by the
Embassy for screening on January 31st. The USCIS has advised the
Embassy to direct applicants wishing to know the office responsible for the
screening to the USCIS website overseas office locator.

http://www.uscis.gov

2) Approximately how long will re-approval take for an average petition
with no problems? (3-6 weeks? 3-4 months?)

Responsibility for the acceptance and approval of immigrant visa petitions
rests solely with USCIS. The Embassy cannot predict the time it will take
for screening at the USCIS.

3) If re-approval wait is very long, is there any way to track the progress
of my petition?

Due to the change in the petitioning procedure, currently there is no
system to track screening of consular approved petitions. The USCIS is
trying to process the cases as early as possible and kindly requests
applicants wait until they are contacted by the USCIS or the Embassy
regarding their case.

4) It's been more than 2 weeks now without any further updates on the
Tokyo embassy website. Will you update those of us waiting for re-
approval via the website, via another method or will you only contact us
after our petitions have been re-approved or denied?

We will update when information becomes available. For information
under USCIS jurisdiction, please see the USCIS website.

When a petition is approved by the USCIS, it will be returned to the
Embassy. Once we receive it, we will contact you to inform you that you
may request your visa interview.

We understand the inconveniences these changes may cause, however, the
law is clear and we must process cases accordingly. We kindly ask your
patience and understanding."

I'm confused about the line "applicants wishing to know the office responsible for the
screening to the USCIS website overseas office locator". New petitions from Japan
must be sent to California, but they say nothing about whether petitions waiting for
re-approval will be sent to California or an overseas field office. The overseas office
for the Asian region is Bangkok, but there's a sub-office in Seoul that covers Korea
and Japan. I'm going to try emailing Bangkok and Seoul and see if they can tell me.

Anybody out there with new updates on their re-approval situations?
iluvmymac
Thanks Maiki for sharing this. This situation is crazy. However at least you now know that your case is "top priority" (if that has any weight) and that your approval will come back to the embassy for you to continue the DCF process. I fedexed my petition package on 1/31 to CA per the Tokyo embassy instructions, but I don't know if my approval will come to the embassy or go on to the NVC (where they are very slow and charge $70 to file the I-864).

If it's any consolation, my wife thinks that you didn't get your money's worth for this e-mail response. Her word was "Hidoi!"

John

QUOTE(maiki @ Feb 15 2007, 10:22 PM) *
Just got this form letter email reply to my inquiries from the Tokyo embassy:

"Thank you for using the U.S. Embassy Visa Information Service.

Please allow us to inform you as follows:

Due to the recently passed Adam Walsh Act, there has been significant
changes in the I-130 procedures for American citizens resident abroad.

1) Where has the petition been sent for re-approval and when was it sent?
If petition is still in Tokyo, when will it be sent and where? (Bangkok,
California, etc.?)

Your petition which was initially approved by consular services was
forwarded with top priority to the appropriate USCIS office by the
Embassy for screening on January 31st. The USCIS has advised the
Embassy to direct applicants wishing to know the office responsible for the
screening to the USCIS website overseas office locator.

http://www.uscis.gov

2) Approximately how long will re-approval take for an average petition
with no problems? (3-6 weeks? 3-4 months?)

Responsibility for the acceptance and approval of immigrant visa petitions
rests solely with USCIS. The Embassy cannot predict the time it will take
for screening at the USCIS.

3) If re-approval wait is very long, is there any way to track the progress
of my petition?

Due to the change in the petitioning procedure, currently there is no
system to track screening of consular approved petitions. The USCIS is
trying to process the cases as early as possible and kindly requests
applicants wait until they are contacted by the USCIS or the Embassy
regarding their case.

4) It's been more than 2 weeks now without any further updates on the
Tokyo embassy website. Will you update those of us waiting for re-
approval via the website, via another method or will you only contact us
after our petitions have been re-approved or denied?

We will update when information becomes available. For information
under USCIS jurisdiction, please see the USCIS website.

When a petition is approved by the USCIS, it will be returned to the
Embassy. Once we receive it, we will contact you to inform you that you
may request your visa interview.

We understand the inconveniences these changes may cause, however, the
law is clear and we must process cases accordingly. We kindly ask your
patience and understanding."

I'm confused about the line "applicants wishing to know the office responsible for the
screening to the USCIS website overseas office locator". New petitions from Japan
must be sent to California, but they say nothing about whether petitions waiting for
re-approval will be sent to California or an overseas field office. The overseas office
for the Asian region is Bangkok, but there's a sub-office in Seoul that covers Korea
and Japan. I'm going to try emailing Bangkok and Seoul and see if they can tell me.

Anybody out there with new updates on their re-approval situations?

peter n peyton
Hi Maiki and John,

I'm in Osaka and in the same situation: I have to pay $15 to hear that there is no update to the situation yet. Very frustrating.

A quick question: I sent my application to the Cali USCIS after the DCF laws changed and I included a $190 US money order from Japan Post. My application was returned yesterday with a letter attached saying that American banks could NOT accept that money order. I'm thinking of going with a Citibank money order when I re-send it. What kind of money order did you send with your petition?

Cheers,

Peter

[quote name='iluvmymac' date='Feb 15 2007, 10:49 PM' post='725979']
Thanks Maiki for sharing this. This situation is crazy. However at least you now know that your case is "top priority" (if that has any weight) and that your approval will come back to the embassy for you to continue the DCF process. I fedexed my petition package on 1/31 to CA per the Tokyo embassy instructions, but I don't know if my approval will come to the embassy or go on to the NVC (where they are very slow and charge $70 to file the I-864).

If it's any consolation, my wife thinks that you didn't get your money's worth for this e-mail response. Her word was "Hidoi!"

John

iluvmymac
Peter,

I sent my package to the Cal address as did you, and I also sent a Japan Post money order. No problems here. I guess you could try a Citibank money order instead.

QUOTE(peter n peyton @ Feb 16 2007, 11:46 AM) *
Hi Maiki and John,

I'm in Osaka and in the same situation: I have to pay $15 to hear that there is no update to the situation yet. Very frustrating.

A quick question: I sent my application to the Cali USCIS after the DCF laws changed and I included a $190 US money order from Japan Post. My application was returned yesterday with a letter attached saying that American banks could NOT accept that money order. I'm thinking of going with a Citibank money order when I re-send it. What kind of money order did you send with your petition?

Cheers,

Peter

QUOTE(iluvmymac @ Feb 15 2007, 10:49 PM) *

Thanks Maiki for sharing this. This situation is crazy. However at least you now know that your case is "top priority" (if that has any weight) and that your approval will come back to the embassy for you to continue the DCF process. I fedexed my petition package on 1/31 to CA per the Tokyo embassy instructions, but I don't know if my approval will come to the embassy or go on to the NVC (where they are very slow and charge $70 to file the I-864).

If it's any consolation, my wife thinks that you didn't get your money's worth for this e-mail response. Her word was "Hidoi!"

John

maiki
QUOTE(iluvmymac @ Feb 15 2007, 08:49 AM) *
If it's any consolation, my wife thinks that you didn't get your money's worth for this e-mail response. Her word was "Hidoi!"


Honma ni hidoi wa. (Gotta practice that Kansai dialect). good.gif
Now today they just sent me a bizarre email saying, "We regret to inform you that we are not yet able to schedule an IV appointment for your at present in accodance with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act." with an MS Word attachment of the very same Adam Walsh letter they snail mailed me 2 weeks ago.

The Bangkok USCIS office is 10x better with communications than the Tokyo embassy. Sent Bangkok an email yesterday and they replied the very next day free of charge.
"We are conducting the necessary namechecks on the petitions forwarded to USCIS. They should be done within a few weeks and returned to the U.S. Consulates
in Japan."

BTW, are we Japan guys the only ones left on this thread?

maiki
QUOTE(peter n peyton @ Feb 15 2007, 09:46 PM) *
My application was returned yesterday with a letter attached saying that American banks could NOT accept that money order.


That sucks. I know for sure the Department of Education accepts Japan Postal money orders, since they accept mine every month for my student loan payments. One sure fire method is if you have a checking account back in the States, then just write a check. If, like me, you have a checking account back home with near zero money in it, you can transfer money into it from Japan and then write the check.
maiki
QUOTE(iluvmymac @ Feb 15 2007, 08:49 AM) *
I don't know if my approval will come to the embassy or go on to the NVC


My understanding is that petition approval would be sent to the embassy, since it's your wife in Japan who needs to interview for the next step after that. And then the embassy would contact your wife to set up the IV interview. I could be totally wrong, but that's my best guess from all the bits and pieces of info. I've come across.
Elle
What was the e-mail address for the Bangkok USCIS office? I'm having trouble accessing their website. TIA


QUOTE(maiki @ Feb 16 2007, 10:15 AM) *
The Bangkok USCIS office is 10x better with communications than the Tokyo embassy. Sent Bangkok an email yesterday and they replied the very next day free of charge.
"We are conducting the necessary namechecks on the petitions forwarded to USCIS. They should be done within a few weeks and returned to the U.S. Consulates
in Japan."

BTW, are we Japan guys the only ones left on this thread?

maiki
QUOTE(Elle @ Feb 16 2007, 11:14 AM) *
What was the e-mail address for the Bangkok USCIS office? I'm having trouble accessing their website. TIA


e-mail address for Bangkok office ...
BKKCIS.Inquiries@dhs.gov

Bangkok office info. here on USCIS locater ...
https://egov.immigration.gov/crisgwi/go?act...r.statecode=abk
Elle
Good stuff good.gif Thank you! I read on here Sydney petitions are to be fwed to Bangkok so I'm wondering if this is true and it they have received any yet.

QUOTE(maiki @ Feb 16 2007, 11:23 AM) *
e-mail address for Bangkok office ...
BKKCIS.Inquiries@dhs.gov

Bangkok office info. here on USCIS locater ...
https://egov.immigration.gov/crisgwi/go?act...r.statecode=abk

jah434s
Hello, I've just gotten engaged biggrin.gif and am new to this process. I've been searching around the forum and it seems as though DCF is the best option for getting my fiancee a visa/greencard. Or at least it used to be? I'm pretty confused about the recent happenings with the new law passed and all. She is from Japan, so do you know if we can still file the I-130 from Japan? If so do you think it would still be a faster way for her to get a green card? Or do you think it would be better just to try and get a K1 fiancee visa and go through the waiting associated with that? Any info or help would be GREATLY appreciated. TIA!

Josh Heath
sooperspryte
QUOTE(maiki @ Feb 17 2007, 12:15 AM) *
BTW, are we Japan guys the only ones left on this thread?


Even if so, please keep posting. I'm in Sapporo applying for my Japanese husband- I-130 approved in December, notified that our interview was cancelled two days after we'd bought the plane tickets to Tokyo (nonrefundable, of course, so donate another $200 to the visa process).

I'm in the same boat, trying to figure out what kind of work I can get after March since I have no way of planning how long I'll be here.

Maiki your posts have helped me very much. I got a similarly uninformative response to my 1200¥ email to the embassy. Is it definite that our stuff went to the Bankok USCIS office? The Tokyo Embassy just said that they had sent it to "the appropriate USCIS office" and that they have no idea how long it'll take or what to do next.

Here's hoping for some good news soon. But at this point any news at all is helpful, so please keep posting!
dbzman
Hello jah434s,

I’m in the same situation that you find yourself in. I have recently gotten engaged to a Japanese woman and we had planned on a wedding date of April 16th.
We were going to file the I-130 in Tokyo after the wedding but now we are being told we have to file in the US.
I am hoping that US Immigration will change this policy and allow the overseas consulates to request a background check from the US office but adjudicate the I-130 in Tokyo.
I would be very interested in knowing anything that you discover about how and where we go in this process.
Good luck with your visa journey!
sooperspryte
QUOTE(jah434s @ Feb 22 2007, 04:07 AM) *
Hello, I've just gotten engaged biggrin.gif and am new to this process. I've been searching around the forum and it seems as though DCF is the best option for getting my fiancee a visa/greencard. Or at least it used to be? I'm pretty confused about the recent happenings with the new law passed and all. She is from Japan, so do you know if we can still file the I-130 from Japan? If so do you think it would still be a faster way for her to get a green card? Or do you think it would be better just to try and get a K1 fiancee visa and go through the waiting associated with that? Any info or help would be GREATLY appreciated. TIA!

Josh Heath


Hi jah434s and dbzman,

I'm nowhere near an expert so anyone who knows better, please correct.

I'm pretty sure that you can't start filing for the green card/visa until you're actually married. If you want you fiance to go to the US before then, you need to go K1. I believe that once she is there and you get married, you can petition for a change in status (I-485, along with an I-130) for her to become a citizen. That takes 1-2 years but she can be in the States during that time. She can also get a social security number while she's waiting so she would be able to work (I've heard that this takes 30 days and that it takes 6 months, I'm not sure which is true).

As for the nowhere land that DCF is now, no one knows anything for sure. However, what I understand from this is that even with the new process, the intending immigrant does not need to travel to the US just to get the visa. The petitioner (you) needs to file the I-130 with the USCIS department based on where you live (in California if you live in Japan). At that point, after the I-130 is approved (no one knows now how long this takes, could be 6 months to a year?), the intending immigrant (your fiance) can then go to the Tokyo Embassy for her interview and final approval. Note: I am NOT sure that this is the case, but it's the impression I'm getting from the little bits of info that seem to be available.

Hope that helps a bit.
dbzman
Hello sooperspryte,
That is the situation as I understand it. Once the marriage has taken place I file in Texas. I was hoping to file in Tokyo since I had heard it is faster when you file there than in the USA but that may not be an option now.
If everyone now has to file in the USA instead of at a consulate we may be in for a long wait.

DCF where are you now!

helpsmilie.gif
tammytoes
I am so *so* confused by all of this!!! I don't get it!

Does this mean that DCF cannot be done at all any more? **boggled mind**
maiki
QUOTE(sooperspryte @ Feb 21 2007, 02:14 PM) *
Is it definite that our stuff went to the Bankok USCIS office? The Tokyo Embassy just said that they had sent it to "the appropriate USCIS office" and that they have no idea how long it'll take or what to do next.


I have no idea how reliable the reply from Bangkok was. They did mention Japan by name, so that's something. The Tokyo embassy's reply to me was to check USCIS's overseas office locater. That leads me to believe our petitions are more likely in Bangkok or Seoul than in California. (Seoul has yet to reply to my email).

It's just ridiculous how we have to be Sherlock Holmes piecing together bits and pieces of information, especially when there's so much the embassy could tell us that they're not. For example, obviously Tokyo knows where they sent our petitions (unless they blindfolded themselves while affixing the address). Why the heck can't they just tell us directly where they sent them?

The way I see it, best case scenario ...
Bangkok has our petitions, finishes the screening in 2-4 weeks and then Tokyo contacts us for our spouses to set up their visa interview appointments.

Worst case scenario ...
I shudder to think
sooperspryte
QUOTE(tammytoes @ Feb 22 2007, 05:16 AM) *
I am so *so* confused by all of this!!! I don't get it!

Does this mean that DCF cannot be done at all any more? **boggled mind**



To the best of my knowledge, interviews (after the I-130 is approved) can still be done at the local embassy, meaning that the immigrant need not fly to the US prior to getting the visa. However the I-130s themselves have to be filed directly to the USCIS. These can be filed by mail. As for which USCIS office to file it in, that info is on the USCIS website.

So, since you need to file the I-130 with the USCIS, not the consulate, the term "direct consular filing" seems to be no longer applicable. However at least some part of this process will still be able to be done outside of the US.
malka
QUOTE(sooperspryte @ Feb 22 2007, 04:10 PM) *
To the best of my knowledge, interviews (after the I-130 is approved) can still be done at the local embassy, meaning that the immigrant need not fly to the US prior to getting the visa. However the I-130s themselves have to be filed directly to the USCIS. These can be filed by mail. As for which USCIS office to file it in, that info is on the USCIS website.

So, since you need to file the I-130 with the USCIS, not the consulate, the term "direct consular filing" seems to be no longer applicable. However at least some part of this process will still be able to be done outside of the US.


Yes - No matter where the petition is filed (USA or abroad), anyone intending to immigrate to the USA through family not only can but MUST have an interview at a consulate in order to get a visa.
payxibka
QUOTE(sooperspryte @ Feb 22 2007, 08:10 AM) *
So, since you need to file the I-130 with the USCIS, not the consulate, the term "direct consular filing" seems to be no longer applicable. However at least some part of this process will still be able to be done outside of the US.


DCF or direct consular filing means direct filing of the petition and petition only (petition and visa application are two distinct and seperate processes so try not to be confused). All normal procedures for visa application and issuance (interview, etc..) after the petition has been approved, have to be and will continue to be done at the consulate.
sooperspryte
QUOTE(fwaguy @ Feb 22 2007, 11:34 PM) *
DCF or direct consular filing means direct filing of the petition and petition only (petition and visa application are two distinct and seperate processes so try not to be confused). All normal procedures for visa application and issuance (interview, etc..) after the petition has been approved, have to be and will continue to be done at the consulate.


Okay, well in that case, yes, it looks like DCF is dead.
John and Sonya
QUOTE(sooperspryte @ Feb 22 2007, 08:49 AM) *
QUOTE(fwaguy @ Feb 22 2007, 11:34 PM) *
DCF or direct consular filing means direct filing of the petition and petition only (petition and visa application are two distinct and seperate processes so try not to be confused). All normal procedures for visa application and issuance (interview, etc..) after the petition has been approved, have to be and will continue to be done at the consulate.


Okay, well in that case, yes, it looks like DCF is dead.


Donot agree its dead as of now, bad info to post. The word is not out as of yet. DCF's took alot of burdens off USCIS and its more practical to perform immigrant visa's at embassy's. So it would be wise of them to keep. The only issue with DCF's is background checks, and there is many ways to simplify that. So why dont we wait for the message from USCIS and DOS before we assume and scare people off. My advice to anyone wanting to immigrate their wife/husband, to wait two weeks and lets see what happens.
ambientgirl
QUOTE(John and Sonya @ Feb 22 2007, 05:52 PM) *
QUOTE(sooperspryte @ Feb 22 2007, 08:49 AM) *
QUOTE(fwaguy @ Feb 22 2007, 11:34 PM) *
DCF or direct consular filing means direct filing of the petition and petition only (petition and visa application are two distinct and seperate processes so try not to be confused). All normal procedures for visa application and issuance (interview, etc..) after the petition has been approved, have to be and will continue to be done at the consulate.


Okay, well in that case, yes, it looks like DCF is dead.


Donot agree its dead as of now, bad info to post. The word is not out as of yet. DCF's took alot of burdens off USCIS and its more practical to perform immigrant visa's at embassy's. So it would be wise of them to keep. The only issue with DCF's is background checks, and there is many ways to simplify that. So why dont we wait for the message from USCIS and DOS before we assume and scare people off. My advice to anyone wanting to immigrate their wife/husband, to wait two weeks and lets see what happens.



Is this regarding certain Embassy(s)? I am in the process of getting ready to send my forms to London - is this a bad idea then? I am a USC who is married to an Englishman. I have been married almost one year but have been living here in the UK since 2003. I am also a dual citizen of the US/UK, does that make a difference?

thanks
briccasart
QUOTE
Is this regarding certain Embassy(s)? I am in the process of getting ready to send my forms to London - is this a bad idea then? I am a USC who is married to an Englishman. I have been married almost one year but have been living here in the UK since 2003. I am also a dual citizen of the US/UK, does that make a difference?

thanks


Not to worry, ambientgirl. You are one of the lucky ones as petitioners within the UK are still allowed to file in London as it's considered a USCIS office. Proceed as normal and follow the instructions on the US Embassy London website.

As for your Affidavit of Support query, you have to make sure that you filed taxes with the IRS regardless of whether you were living in the UK since 2003, especially for year ending 2006. The federal 1040 plus Form 2555 will apply in your case. If you also have savings back in the US that brings you above the poverty level for a household of 2 people, you can show that on the I-864 as well. If this is the case, you might not need a co-sponsor. Don't quote me on the latter. Perhaps someone else here can advise you on that.

Check out Kimberly+Dave's thread about filing with the IRS. It should be on page 1 or 2 in this forum.

You're so lucky, but I'll still wish you luck anyway. good.gif


ambientgirl
QUOTE(briccasart @ Feb 22 2007, 08:40 PM) *
QUOTE
Is this regarding certain Embassy(s)? I am in the process of getting ready to send my forms to London - is this a bad idea then? I am a USC who is married to an Englishman. I have been married almost one year but have been living here in the UK since 2003. I am also a dual citizen of the US/UK, does that make a difference?

thanks


Not to worry, ambientgirl. You are one of the lucky ones as petitioners within the UK are still allowed to file in London as it's considered a USCIS office. Proceed as normal and follow the instructions on the US Embassy London website.

As for your Affidavit of Support query, you have to make sure that you filed taxes with the IRS regardless of whether you were living in the UK since 2003, especially for year ending 2006. The federal 1040 plus Form 2555 will apply in your case. If you also have savings back in the US that brings you above the poverty level for a household of 2 people, you can show that on the I-864 as well. If this is the case, you might not need a co-sponsor. Don't quote me on the latter. Perhaps someone else here can advise you on that.

Check out Kimberly+Dave's thread about filing with the IRS. It should be on page 1 or 2 in this forum.

You're so lucky, but I'll still wish you luck anyway. good.gif


THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU Sooooo Much for your quick response. smile.gif You have been wonderful. I didn't want to send out my papers to have them sent back to send to the US for processing.

I'm going to try to find the Kimberly and Daves thread to check out the Tax IRS info.

Hopefully we can do our own affidavit of support but if not, hopefully someone has the info that I need about it???

I wish you luck with your process. smile.gif

thanks again
maiki
QUOTE(John and Sonya @ Feb 22 2007, 12:52 PM) *
The only issue with DCF's is background checks, and there is many ways to simplify that ... My advice to anyone wanting to immigrate their wife/husband, to wait two weeks and lets see what happens.


Since consular officers don't have the legal authority to do the Walsh screenings, first, at least one USCIS officer would have to be stationed in every country in order for DCF to be reinstated. Second, whatever database is used (or remote access to it) would have to be set up in each country. I imagine those 2 things are no minor undertaking. Even IF DHS and DoS coordinate and decide that's the way to go, it'll take A LOT longer than 2 weeks. Seems to me the most efficient way to go for USCIS would be to to increase the resources of foreign regional offices to handle all overseas I-130s.
malka
QUOTE(maiki @ Feb 23 2007, 03:38 PM) *
QUOTE(John and Sonya @ Feb 22 2007, 12:52 PM) *
The only issue with DCF's is background checks, and there is many ways to simplify that ... My advice to anyone wanting to immigrate their wife/husband, to wait two weeks and lets see what happens.


Since consular officers don't have the legal authority to do the Walsh screenings, first, at least one USCIS officer would have to be stationed in every country in order for DCF to be reinstated. Second, whatever database is used (or remote access to it) would have to be set up in each country. I imagine those 2 things are no minor undertaking. Even IF DHS and DoS coordinate and decide that's the way to go, it'll take A LOT longer than 2 weeks. Seems to me the most efficient way to go for USCIS would be to to increase the resources of foreign regional offices to handle all overseas I-130s.



Well... they may set something up that allows consular officers to just email the names of petitioners to USCIS offices. USCIS in Vienna is speculating that that will be the plan, and that it should go pretty quickly. So DCF really may come back. Several embassies and consulates have told VJers that they understand that it will come back, and that they are simply waiting for protocol instructions.
maiki
Finally got a reply from the Seoul office ...

"At this time I can inform you that we have received the I-130 petitions from Tokyo. It will be at least two weeks before the petitions can be adjudicated, which will be completed in the order in which they were received. We will have more information at that time.
Regards,
Correspondence Officer
DHS/CIS
Seoul, Korea "

As I said in an earlier post, the Bangkok office had replied to me ...

"We are conducting the necessary namechecks on the petitions forwarded to USCIS. They should be done within a few weeks and returned to the U.S. Consulates in Japan."

So I don't know if petitions pending re-approval from Japan are in Bangkok or Seoul, but since Seoul is the sub-office (for Korea and Japan) under jurisdiction of the Bangkok regional office, I suppose it's just a matter of semantics. My guess is that Seoul would be quicker since they only cover 2 countries.
girlafraid7
QUOTE(ambientgirl @ Feb 22 2007, 10:04 PM) *
QUOTE(briccasart @ Feb 22 2007, 08:40 PM) *
QUOTE
Is this regarding certain Embassy(s)? I am in the process of getting ready to send my forms to London - is this a bad idea then? I am a USC who is married to an Englishman. I have been married almost one year but have been living here in the UK since 2003. I am also a dual citizen of the US/UK, does that make a difference?

thanks


Not to worry, ambientgirl. You are one of the lucky ones as petitioners within the UK are still allowed to file in London as it's considered a USCIS office. Proceed as normal and follow the instructions on the US Embassy London website.

As for your Affidavit of Support query, you have to make sure that you filed taxes with the IRS regardless of whether you were living in the UK since 2003, especially for year ending 2006. The federal 1040 plus Form 2555 will apply in your case. If you also have savings back in the US that brings you above the poverty level for a household of 2 people, you can show that on the I-864 as well. If this is the case, you might not need a co-sponsor. Don't quote me on the latter. Perhaps someone else here can advise you on that.

Check out Kimberly+Dave's thread about filing with the IRS. It should be on page 1 or 2 in this forum.

You're so lucky, but I'll still wish you luck anyway. good.gif


THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU Sooooo Much for your quick response. smile.gif You have been wonderful. I didn't want to send out my papers to have them sent back to send to the US for processing.

I'm going to try to find the Kimberly and Daves thread to check out the Tax IRS info.

Hopefully we can do our own affidavit of support but if not, hopefully someone has the info that I need about it???

I wish you luck with your process. smile.gif

thanks again


Hi there,
I read that you are still able to file in London, but that is NOT DCF. DCF, to my understanding was VERY quick, like less than a month in some cases. However, filing directly in London or in my case in Rome, well, I was quoted 4-6 months to get it processed. Anyone else out there been quoted filing times in London or Rome? Therefore, I am waiting 2 weeks to see if anything will happen with DCF (because if it comes back, I'm definintely doing DCF!) and if not file in Rome and wait 4-6 months. By the way, I live in Spain (waiting for DCF in Madrid) but am able to file in Rome because they have jurisdiction over Spain.
maiki
QUOTE(malka @ Feb 23 2007, 08:49 AM) *
Well... they may set something up that allows consular officers to just email the names of petitioners to USCIS offices.


That would be great.
When I first got the Adam Walsh letter I was wondering why they couldn't just do that, email or fax all the names to a CIS office, have them do the checks, then email/fax back re-approvals. But the directive that started this whole thing clearly states that previously approved petitions had to be sent with all supporting documentation to CIS to be re-approved. Unless they change that "supporting documentation" part, then they have to continue doing it via snail mail.
redtape777
Here is the email reply I received from the Tokyo Embassy. Some of the answers have been addressed previously in this thread.

1)Can applicant enter US with an F1 or OPT visa without jeopardizing
the I-130 application?


If the applicant is going to the United States as a student, is in
possession
of an I-20, and will depart the United States upon termination of
his/her
course of study, he/she may apply for an F-1 visa. However, it is
important that the applicant applies for the visa suited to his/her
activities
and period of stay in the United States. An F-1 visa is a non-immigrant
visa and is for persons who will stay temporarily in the United States
and
depart after completion of their activities. Whether a spouse of an
American citizen will be issued this visa is the decision of the
adjudicating
consular officer. Even if you are issued this visa, it is possible that
the
immigrations officer with see immigrant intent and deny entry to the
United States.

2)If applicant is able to enter US on a non-immigrant visa,is it possible to arrange the interview in the US?


The interview must be in Tokyo.

3)When was my I-130 sent and to which USCIS office?

Your petition was sent to the USCIS on January 29th. We have be
instructed by the USCIS to advise applicants not to contact them about
case status. The USCIS is trying to screen cases as soon as possible
and
would like to use all available time for this process which is not
possible if
they are responding to applicant inquiries.

4)Should I wait for final interview or apply for k-3?

We are unable to advise you as to what you "should" do. You may like to
note however that petitions submitted overseas are not eligible for K
visas.
Please refer to the information on the webpage below:

http://travel.state.gov/visa/immigrants/ty...types_2993.html

5)How long after the final interview does it take to get visa?

If there are no problems at the interview, the applicant may be issued
an
immigrant visa in about a week after the interview. Each case differs,
however, and we are not able to inform you as to how long it may take
to
have a visa issued in your case.

6)I made an appt online after my initial one was cancelled,is it still
valid?

When the USCIS returns your case to Tokyo, you will be contacted to
arrange an interview appointment.

7)Is USCIS checking the I-130 again or just a criminal background check?

We do not have the details of the process at USCIS. We kindly ask you
to
contact the USCIS with your concerns or inquiries on procedures. You
can
do this through the information below. The USCIS website is at the URL
below:

http://www.uscis.gov

8)If it is just a criminal check how long does the process take once
received
by USCIS?

We do not have any answers as to how long the process for USCIS to
approve a petition will take. This is not under the jurisdiction of
overseas
consular services.

9)Is there any way to track our application without spending money on
emails and phone calls given that this is not our fault?


We kindly ask you to contact the USCIS with your concerns or inquiries.

10)USCIS informs us that they are processing applications from Okinawa
before Tokyo,how long will that delay Tokyo applications?


We do not have any answers as to how long the process for USCIS to
approve a petition will take. This is not under the jurisdiction of
overseas
consular services.

11)USCIS california ctr are processing I-130s from June of 2006, does
this
mean we will have to wait or are I-130s from Tokyo processed
separately?

Most likely the cases are processed separately.

We understand the inconveniences these changes may cause, however, the
law is clear and we must process cases accordingly. We kindly ask your
patience and understanding.
dbzman
This law has come as a surprise to everyone. I was planning on getting married to my fiancé in April. She lives in Japan and had to turn her work notice in to her company because she worked on a yearly contract that had to be renewed each year. We thought that she would be able to make it to the US before the end of the year. Her job runs out in March and I am now worried that she will have to live without employment for a lot longer then we planned.
While I can understand the need for the law (we needed to do something about child abuse) I can not understand why they have to complicate an already complicated process. Surely the US government can come up with an easier way to do this (I can’t believe that I said that!).
If I have to file in the US it will take a lot longer then it would have in Japan. My fiancé and I are hoping that they will fix this soon.

Here’s wishing everyone luck!

blink.gif
iluvmymac
QUOTE(redtape777 @ Mar 1 2007, 09:07 AM) *
Here is the email reply I received from the Tokyo Embassy. Some of the answers have been addressed previously in this thread.

1)Can applicant enter US with an F1 or OPT visa without jeopardizing
the I-130 application?


If the applicant is going to the United States as a student, is in
possession
of an I-20, and will depart the United States upon termination of
his/her
course of study, he/she may apply for an F-1 visa. However, it is
important that the applicant applies for the visa suited to his/her
activities
and period of stay in the United States. An F-1 visa is a non-immigrant
visa and is for persons who will stay temporarily in the United States
and
depart after completion of their activities. Whether a spouse of an
American citizen will be issued this visa is the decision of the
adjudicating
consular officer. Even if you are issued this visa, it is possible that
the
immigrations officer with see immigrant intent and deny entry to the
United States.

2)If applicant is able to enter US on a non-immigrant visa,is it possible to arrange the interview in the US?


The interview must be in Tokyo.

3)When was my I-130 sent and to which USCIS office?

Your petition was sent to the USCIS on January 29th. We have be
instructed by the USCIS to advise applicants not to contact them about
case status. The USCIS is trying to screen cases as soon as possible
and
would like to use all available time for this process which is not
possible if
they are responding to applicant inquiries.

4)Should I wait for final interview or apply for k-3?

We are unable to advise you as to what you "should" do. You may like to
note however that petitions submitted overseas are not eligible for K
visas.
Please refer to the information on the webpage below:

http://travel.state.gov/visa/immigrants/ty...types_2993.html

5)How long after the final interview does it take to get visa?

If there are no problems at the interview, the applicant may be issued
an
immigrant visa in about a week after the interview. Each case differs,
however, and we are not able to inform you as to how long it may take
to
have a visa issued in your case.

6)I made an appt online after my initial one was cancelled,is it still
valid?

When the USCIS returns your case to Tokyo, you will be contacted to
arrange an interview appointment.

7)Is USCIS checking the I-130 again or just a criminal background check?

We do not have the details of the process at USCIS. We kindly ask you
to
contact the USCIS with your concerns or inquiries on procedures. You
can
do this through the information below. The USCIS website is at the URL
below:

http://www.uscis.gov

8)If it is just a criminal check how long does the process take once
received
by USCIS?

We do not have any answers as to how long the process for USCIS to
approve a petition will take. This is not under the jurisdiction of
overseas
consular services.

9)Is there any way to track our application without spending money on
emails and phone calls given that this is not our fault?


We kindly ask you to contact the USCIS with your concerns or inquiries.

10)USCIS informs us that they are processing applications from Okinawa
before Tokyo,how long will that delay Tokyo applications?


We do not have any answers as to how long the process for USCIS to
approve a petition will take. This is not under the jurisdiction of
overseas
consular services.

11)USCIS california ctr are processing I-130s from June of 2006, does
this
mean we will have to wait or are I-130s from Tokyo processed
separately?

Most likely the cases are processed separately.

We understand the inconveniences these changes may cause, however, the
law is clear and we must process cases accordingly. We kindly ask your
patience and understanding.


Geez, the Tokyo embassy is the most useless institution.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.