QUOTE(mybackpages @ Oct 27 2006, 01:18 PM)

QUOTE(peezey @ Oct 27 2006, 01:11 PM)

Actually, Jews are considered an ethno-religious group. This is widely known and not really up for argument in the sociology/antropology/religous study world. You can belong to more than one ethnic group. However, if you go back to Rebecca's original suggestion that we read the definition of the word ghetto, you would find this
"A ghetto is an area where people from a specific racial or ethnic background or united in a given culture or religion live as a group, voluntarily or involuntarily, in milder or stricter seclusion."
QUOTE(mybackpages @ Oct 27 2006, 01:04 PM)

QUOTE(peezey @ Oct 27 2006, 12:47 PM)

The point is not the derivation of the word or the original use of the word, but it's current use in the US. Furthermore, ethnic groups are not only defined by the color of one's skin. Jews are an ethnic group.
Actually Jews are a religious group. There are Arab Jews, European Jews, etc...
Looks like I misread your statement and jumped the gun. I agree with this last posting completely.
Mybackpages, apologies if my response was strong in tone. I think the definition is fine, but we aren't talking about that specifically, although it is an important one.
My problem with the use of the word "ghetto" as a slang way of saying "bad neighborhood" is highly elitist and arrogant. If you live in a particular neighborhood and you use a term that classically means an enclave of a particular minority group and/or an economically disadvantaged group, you are then saying that you are much better than this particular neighborhood and you really don't deserve to live there. If you don't like living there, fine, but don't degrade those who do by making such a separatist and elitist comment.
Before everyone goes nuts, the term "you" isn't referring to anyone specific.
QUOTE(szsz @ Oct 27 2006, 01:27 PM)

QUOTE(peezey @ Oct 27 2006, 12:11 PM)

Actually, Jews are considered an ethno-religious group. This is widely known and not really up for argument in the sociology/antropology/religous study world. You can belong to more than one ethnic group. However, if you go back to Rebecca's original suggestion that we read the definition of the word ghetto, you would find this
"A ghetto is an area where people from a specific racial or ethnic background or united in a given culture or religion live as a group, voluntarily or involuntarily, in milder or stricter seclusion."
And after that sentence, you will find these:
A ghetto is an area where people from a specific racial or ethnic background or united in a given culture or religion live as a group, voluntarily or involuntarily, in milder or stricter seclusion. The word historically referred specifically to the Venetian Ghetto in Venice, Italy, where Jews were required to live; it derives from the Venetian gheto (slag from Latin GLĬTTU[M] cfr. Italian ghetto (slag)), and referred to the area of the Cannaregio sestiere, the site selected for the Ghetto Nuovo where a foundry cooled the slag (campo gheto). It was later applied to neighborhoods in other cities where Jews were required to live. The corresponding German term was Judengasse; in Moroccan Arabic ghettos were called mellah.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GhettoThe fact is, the original connotation for ghetto refered to whites, so there is nothing stopping white people from living in ghettos. White people have ethnic groups too.
No one is arguing who can or cannot live in a ghetto. It is the derogatory use of the word that is being discussed. Also, we aren't discussing who originally lived in ghettos, but how the word is used today, specifically in the US, specifically as a slang word, specifically to describe something undesirable, in this case, VPs old neighborhood.