Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Used the new I-129 and still got an IMBRA RFE
VisaJourney.com > Marriage Based Immigration (K1, K2, K3, etc) to the USA > IMBRA Special Topics

evansfan
I made a cusrsory exam of the RFE and their is some additional language about the 2 year period before reapplying for a new K1, maybe that is why I got one. I will call Vermont tomorrow and inquire.


Jay
mrc
Yes, let us know what it is about. I also used to the new I-129. None of it applied to me, so I didn't check any of it.
dwar49
Are you sure it is IMBRA RFE? The standard IMBRA only asked 3 questions.

1. did you meet thru a marriage broker
2. Have you ever been convicted of certain crimes
3. if you were convicted were you battered etc.

The information sheet talks about a waiver required if you have had a K-1 approved in within the last two years, or if you have applied for more than 2 K-1 but no questions about it.

How did you answer the questions on the I-129F concerning the above items?
evansfan
None of it applied to me as well, that is what is strange. I am hoping that maybe a clerical error was made, and someone did not realize my form was a new one

Jay

QUOTE(dwar49 @ Jul 12 2006, 11:58 PM) *

Are you sure it is IMBRA RFE? The standard IMBRA only asked 3 questions.

1. did you meet thru a marriage broker
2. Have you ever been convicted of certain crimes
3. if you were convicted were you battered etc.

The information sheet talks about a waiver required if you have had a K-1 approved in within the last two years, or if you have applied for more than 2 K-1 but no questions about it.

How did you answer the questions on the I-129F concerning the above items?



Yes, The RFE asked 3 questions. In my original I-129, I only answered one since I did not use a marriage broker, and had never been convicted of a crime. I just noticed that the waiver language appears to be the only additional information on my RFE that was not on the I129
dwar49
You got me on this one. First I have heard of anyone receiving RFE on IMBRA when they used the new form. Maybe someone else has but havnt heard of it. Think I would definitly check with the center and see if you can get an answer. Someone else might know on the board too. Check back tomorrow morning and see if anyone else can be of more help. Sorry I couldnt help more.
William33
evansfan,

Are you certain that the RFE is IMBRA related? If so, what led you to this conclusion? Have you applied for a K-1 before?

Your post suggests a possible request for justification of a new I-129F.

Any additional info might help with the assessment of the RFE purpose.
aussiewench
QUOTE(evansfan @ Jul 13 2006, 02:04 PM) *

Yes, The RFE asked 3 questions. In my original I-129, I only answered one since I did not use a marriage broker, and had never been convicted of a crime. I just noticed that the waiver language appears to be the only additional information on my RFE that was not on the I129

The language however is in the instructions for the new I-129F

Filing Limitations on K Nonimmigrant Petitioners.If you have filed two or more K-1 visa petitions at any time in the past or previously had a K-1 visa petition approved within two years prior to the filing of this petition, you must apply for a waiver. To request a waiver you must submit a written request with this petition accompanied bydocumentation of your claim to the waiver.

Clerical errors do get made and this being a new implementation there is going to be a settling period for those at the service centers.

If you havent yet received the hard copy of the RFE, it may also very well be for something missing or incomplete with your petition and not as you are concluding. Let us know.
evansfan
Everyone,

East coast, so late and brain more scrambled then usual. I apologize for any confusion.

1-Thanks for the information on the language, so my RFE appears to contain nothing new in comparison to the new I-129
2- I have the hard copy of the RFE, and it is asking the same questions contained in the new I 129, and the questions in the RFE refer only to the IMBRA law, nothing else was requested. I am required to answer the questions, sign and return the form
3- THis is my first and hopefully last time applying for a K1


Thanks to all of you
I will keep you posted

Jay
aussiewench
QUOTE(evansfan @ Jul 13 2006, 03:29 PM) *

Everyone,

East coast, so late and brain more scrambled then usual. I apologize for any confusion.

1-Thanks for the information on the language, so my RFE appears to contain nothing new in comparison to the new I-129
2- I have the hard copy of the RFE, and it is asking the same questions contained in the new I 129, and the questions in the RFE refer only to the IMBRA law, nothing else was requested. I am required to answer the questions, sign and return the form
3- THis is my first and hopefully last time applying for a K1


Thanks to all of you
I will keep you posted

Jay

Clerical error then by the looks of it. When you complete/sign and return it, perhaps attach a seperate sheet bringing this to their attention, that you submitted the NEW I-129F which already covered this and this apparently was an oversight.
Luvinmybaby
QUOTE(aussiewench @ Jul 12 2006, 11:29 PM) *

QUOTE(evansfan @ Jul 13 2006, 02:04 PM) *

Yes, The RFE asked 3 questions. In my original I-129, I only answered one since I did not use a marriage broker, and had never been convicted of a crime. I just noticed that the waiver language appears to be the only additional information on my RFE that was not on the I129

The language however is in the instructions for the new I-129F

Filing Limitations on K Nonimmigrant Petitioners.If you have filed two or more K-1 visa petitions at any time in the past or previously had a K-1 visa petition approved within two years prior to the filing of this petition, you must apply for a waiver. To request a waiver you must submit a written request with this petition accompanied bydocumentation of your claim to the waiver.

Clerical errors do get made and this being a new implementation there is going to be a settling period for those at the service centers.

If you havent yet received the hard copy of the RFE, it may also very well be for something missing or incomplete with your petition and not as you are concluding. Let us know.

There are some subtle but important differences between the law and the RFE form. I was wondering what will be the standard.
This is from the law:
‘‘(i) the petitioner has not, previous to the pending petition,
petitioned under paragraph (1) with respect to two or more
applying aliens; AND ‘‘(ii) if the petitioner has had such a petition previously
approved, 2 years have elapsed since the FILING of such previously
approved petition.

This is from the RFE:
If you have filed two or more K-1 visa petitions at any time in the past OR previously had a K-1 visa petition APPROVED within two years prior to the filing of this petition, you must apply for a waiver.

Now, my question. Which one is the USCIS compelled to follow? If they go by the approved standard rather the filing standard do they go by when the first one was filed or when the first one was approved? If they go by the approved standard and they go by the approved date rather than the filed date for the first petition then I should have filed for a waiver. I didn't file a waiver, but my first petition was filed 2 years 2 months before my second one was but the first one was approved 1 year and 11 months before I filed the second one. Am I in for another RFE???
aussiewench
QUOTE(Luvinmybaby @ Jul 13 2006, 04:31 PM) *

QUOTE(aussiewench @ Jul 12 2006, 11:29 PM) *

QUOTE(evansfan @ Jul 13 2006, 02:04 PM) *

Yes, The RFE asked 3 questions. In my original I-129, I only answered one since I did not use a marriage broker, and had never been convicted of a crime. I just noticed that the waiver language appears to be the only additional information on my RFE that was not on the I129

The language however is in the instructions for the new I-129F

Filing Limitations on K Nonimmigrant Petitioners.If you have filed two or more K-1 visa petitions at any time in the past or previously had a K-1 visa petition approved within two years prior to the filing of this petition, you must apply for a waiver. To request a waiver you must submit a written request with this petition accompanied bydocumentation of your claim to the waiver.

Clerical errors do get made and this being a new implementation there is going to be a settling period for those at the service centers.

If you havent yet received the hard copy of the RFE, it may also very well be for something missing or incomplete with your petition and not as you are concluding. Let us know.

There are some subtle but important differences between the law and the RFE form. I was wondering what will be the standard.
This is from the law:
‘‘(i) the petitioner has not, previous to the pending petition,
petitioned under paragraph (1) with respect to two or more
applying aliens; AND ‘‘(ii) if the petitioner has had such a petition previously
approved, 2 years have elapsed since the FILING of such previously
approved petition.

This is from the RFE:
If you have filed two or more K-1 visa petitions at any time in the past OR previously had a K-1 visa petition APPROVED within two years prior to the filing of this petition, you must apply for a waiver.

Now, my question. Which one is the USCIS compelled to follow? If they go by the approved standard rather the filing standard do they go by when the first one was filed or when the first one was approved? If they go by the approved standard and they go by the approved date rather than the filed date for the first petition then I should have filed for a waiver. I didn't file a waiver, but my first petition was filed 2 years 2 months before my second one was but the first one was approved 1 year and 11 months before I filed the second one. Am I in for another RFE???


I wasnt referring to the written law, but the instructions on the I-129F when comparing to the RFE.

However to answer you, I actually read and understand it as one and the same. It refers to an approved petition that was filed within 2 years of filing the present one.
Luvinmybaby
QUOTE(aussiewench @ Jul 13 2006, 01:44 AM) *


I wasnt referring to the written law, but the instructions on the I-129F when comparing to the RFE.

However to answer you, I actually read and understand it as one and the same. It refers to an approved petition that was filed within 2 years of filing the present one.

Oh God thank you Aussiewench! I didn't catch the difference when I mailed in my RFE. I have been sweating bullets worring about that.
mystery
This totally sux, big time. Hopefully it was an oversite by the officer attending your case.

I also sent in the NEW I-129f so I'm praying I don't get one too.....

evansfan
I spoke with VSC. The gentleman who answered the phone was very polite, and he thinks that it was exactly as I thought. My I-129 was placed in a stack with the others that needed a RFE. He sugggested I simply return my RFE, and let the process move forward.

Jay
wodengdaini
QUOTE(evansfan @ Jul 13 2006, 04:50 PM) *

I spoke with VSC. The gentleman who answered the phone was very polite, and he thinks that it was exactly as I thought. My I-129 was placed in a stack with the others that needed a RFE. He sugggested I simply return my RFE, and let the process move forward.

Jay


Good to see another from China. It is a shame that they stuck you in the wrong pile. We have a long enough wait as it is with Guanghzou. Good news is that you are at the VSC, so you should move out of there pretty quick once they get the RFE back and processed. Best of luck to you. There is some great information on http://candleforlove.com/forums/index.php it is set up for US/China people going through the same process. When you have time, you should check it out.
mystery
QUOTE(evansfan @ Jul 13 2006, 05:50 PM) *

I spoke with VSC. The gentleman who answered the phone was very polite, and he thinks that it was exactly as I thought. My I-129 was placed in a stack with the others that needed a RFE. He sugggested I simply return my RFE, and let the process move forward.

Jay


I'll be praying they won't stick my aplication in the wrong stack either......

But I agree with the above comment, atleast you're in VSC, they movin real quick!!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.