janaknjanet,
Sounds like you are confusing the duration of the visa with the duration of the allowed stay in the USA. Understandable, given the language of the example letter, and points out another flaw in the letter. It's the CBP agent at the POE who determines how long a visitor will be allowed to stay in the USA, not the visa.
QUOTE(JanaknJanet @ May 12 2006, 02:20 PM)

Not sure of when this letter was written either but isn't a majority of the B-1/B-2 visas now only given for 90 days.. ? I think in past they possibly granted longer visas so this timeframe is irrelevant. Main thing is it shows that you are traveling touring and have a planned itinary.
The statement also calls into question the truthfulness of the claim to a successful business, in two ways.
The visa applicant makes no mention in his letter of how the alleged successful business will be kept going in his absence. It's the duty of the visa officer to be skeptical, not to assume information that the visa appliocant has not provided.
And there's the inconsistency between claiming to be a successful businessman yet needing a sponsor who will pay for everything. Inconsistencies are negatives, and need to be avoided or addressed.
QUOTE(JanaknJanet @ May 12 2006, 02:20 PM)

"" Not all owners or Proprietors are the only ones running businesses. .. The statement shows that he owns a business and that he has income and ability to provide, also shows strong ties and responsibilities to have to return to . [/i]
Another inconsistency that needs to be addressed but is not. This does not show a need to return, it shows an inability to leave. You are quite right - the letter is not stating that care will not be provided. Nor does it say how care that is claimed to be essential will be provided. The care can't be too essential then, can it? And if there is another way to provide the care, that removes the need for the visa applicant to provide the care, doesn't it?
QUOTE(JanaknJanet @ May 12 2006, 02:20 PM)

That I have my old parents I need to take care of. My father ... is 78 years old and my mother ... is 73 years old. Both of them are staying with me and I need to take care of them as they are fully dependent on me.
So who is going to take care of these "fully dependent"people who need your care if you will be gone for 6 months?
This is showing the need to return.. It is not stating that the care is not being provided for them by someone in his absence is it? It could have indeed been clarified further stating that if visa is granted the care for his dependents will be provided by hired care or other.
Yes, I look at these things as a complete skeptic. Because that's the way that visa officers look at things.
Yodrak