QUOTE(zyggy @ Jun 20 2006, 08:37 AM)

lexi .. I think what people are getting at is... How can one consider themselves a resident of the US of they are in Canada for 3 to 4 days a week. In your case, there is a very real threat of having the CBP one day stating that she is not a true resident of the US due to her constant travelling and residing in Canada.
how do international business travellers have the security of being able to come home to their country then?
QUOTE(zyggy @ Jun 20 2006, 08:37 AM)

This may be a case where you have to choose what is the most important to you... Having your wife with you in the US with a new job in the US, or you in Canada with her with you having a new job in Canada. Keeping one toe in Canada (or in your spouses case half her body) could result in more problems than you care to stand... You have to choose between one or the other .. straddling is not one of the choices...
The purpose of permanent residency is just that... leaving and breaking all your ties in your home country and establishing new roots in the US....
There may be ways that your spouse can pull what she wants off.. but keeping herself on the payroll of a Canadian company and doing work in Canada is not one of them...
Just a suggestion, she may want to consider forming her own consulting company and contract herself to her old company, but you should get expert help from an accountant and an attorney before you do that... but keeping the same arrangement that she has always kept is not a good idea...
shes doing this now, working both in the US from our home and in the office while in canada. now, her company is also in the process of expanding into the US, so travel and communication at both levels is necessary at this point. in addition, she is providing training to people both here and there, so, how does this continue to happen? the canadian company should invest more money in someone to travel to the US on a weekly basis instead of utilizing the resources that already reside here?
Thanks for the information, but i find it hard to believe that with all the business travel throughout the world, and with the rise of foundations like nafta, that an opportunity for the US to have a new immigrant not only avoid the burden of needing UE, but to benefit from her taxable earnings from another country would be frowned upon. I will, however, discuss this with her and some legal assistance.
maybe im just looking at it wrong, so sorry if i seem ignorant on the subject. but, then again, how did importing/exporting become so lucrative, if not for the immigrant with a vision?
We arent trying to scam any one system or another, we are trying to be able to afford a home and the cost of living by both working..