QUOTE(rushter @ May 30 2006, 10:04 AM)

Well perhaps those attempting to analyze the situation should look carefully at the timeline? As the USCIS and DOS is paid to do?
(If you disagree with me on the 'appearance' of the whole thing, then fine, but something(s) just don't make any sense here).
July 31, 2004- USCIS received my petition
April 12, 2005 - Petition and Waiver to meeting face to face are denied
(This should have never happened, much less applied for IMO).
THE NEW JOURNEY HAS BEGUN
April 19-26, 2005- Visit in Germany (first time ever)
..... (snip).....
Aug 29, 2005- DS230 and another form was returned to my fiance for completion
Sep 1, 2005- My fiance returned everything
October 28,2005 -Administrative Review
(So what was the reason for Administrative Review? Any info in it?)
November 7-15, 2005- Vacation in Germany
December 21, 2005- Contact my Senator again.
JAN 2006- Decided to send an email to the Consulate and received a reply that our application is still pending.
FEB 27, 2006- I wrote another letter to the Senator again
MAR, 2006- I called the Consulate and received information that my fiance had a scheduled interview for Feb 20, 2006 and failed to show-up
Your kidding me right? Failed to show up?
MARCH 18-30 - MY THIRD VISIT TO GERMANY
You're certainly paying YOUR dues in this effort...
MARCH 20, 2006- Interview
MARCH 29, 2006- we turned in everything for them to process the visa, they promise it will take 10 days
VISA IN HAND!!!!!!!!!
Then shonjaved chimes in:
let me say this Atlanta is the worst POE for Muslim immigrants.
Ok.... So this fellow is a muslim. (Really? I can't see where it was previously indicated anywhere).
He refused to sign a biographical information form at the poe, and was subsequently denied entry.... needed a translator???
Hunh?
I would have to say on it's face, it's obvious that it's not immigration law compliance that's the issue, but whether the person intends to comply with immigration law, or comply with the laws of the usa.
First by applying for the no meet face to face thing... Good Gawd, that alone takes an act of congress to pull off - you obviously solved the problem by travelling to meet him instead - SEVEN DAYS after the denial? It's not like it takes a rocket scientist to figure out that the waiver was bogus in the first place since you went to meet him so quickly thereafter.
Second was that he allegedly didn't show up for a scheduled interview in his home country. After you had petitioned him... (The only real reason I could imagine someone missing this interview is a death in the family or the death of the beneficiary! - but at least they would reschedule the thing!)
Third he refused to sign a biographic information form at the port of entry. And he needed an interpreter.
Who did what wrong here?
Hell I'm no big fan of immigration legislation, but this pattern of behaviour is literally spitting in the face of the folks that are employed to enforce it.
All I can see are red flags.
Why did this behaviour take place to begin with? Why on earth did you attempt to petition to avoid meeting face to face?
Go ahead burn me to the ground for my comments, but something just stinks here.
listion IDIOT!@ zz
1st.. her time line is not off..
2nd POE is very harsh on muslims in ATL. 2 hour interrogation on all muslims is not acceptable!
along with a call from POE to question the USC is not acceptable either!
3rd.. there are NO red flags when a VISA is issued!
4th .. Admin review can happen to anyone! including you! - its security checks
5th .. just because the interview was missed did not mean her husband did anything wrong.
they never got the orginal letter. she dont have to get in details a
6th.. get a life you certainly need one.