QUOTE(Virtual wife @ Jun 27 2008, 03:52 AM)

With all due respect, the folks at Islamqa throughly enjoy pronouncing haram things that have not been made haram by Allah, the only One who can declare something haram. It also employs the political tactic of declaring anything they disagree with as "western" (read: modern), as tho being non-Western is more Islamic than being western. Allah was not concerned with dictating that Muslims follow Arab practices - recalled in the fatwa (a legal opinion we is free to adopt, discern, or disregard) by the tradition of calling people "‘ibn’ (son of) or ‘ibnatu’ (daughter of) between their own names and the name of their fathers."
Islam was sent to all parts of the earth, and, frankly, it is not an Arab faith, nor are we required to take on Arab cultural affectations to be a good Muslims. Just as the Message was transmitted and prayers offered in many languages before Arabic became the norm, the practices of other cultures were allowed to be interpreted within the Message as long as it did not corrupt it.
The bottom line is, the explanation for a wife not changing her name to her husband's is that she "belongs" to her father, as children from her marriage belong to their father. Her lineage is subordinated to her husband's; it is his that is central to the family. The argument is that a woman is to keep a family name only for the purpose of making it clear which man she "belongs to"; an adjunct position is that upon marriage, she takes on her husband's status and preferences, and moves to his home (Islam, in this mode is portrayed as patrilineal and patrilocal), thus becoming his appendage, defined by him.
This view can only be accepted if one also believes that, in Islam, women are defined by men, and not by God, that Islam inherently adheres to patriarchal norms found in Arab cultures, and that "western" is unIslamic and "non-western" is Islamic. Political resistance to the concept that one can be Muslim and western (modern), and that Muslim practice does not always equal ancient Arab practice has done much to preclude an honest discussion re interpreting the texts in a way that allows for Muslims of all stripes and cultures to make legitimate contributions to the ummah without having to bow to the perceived "authenticity" of a mere 18% of the Muslim world that is Arab in practice.
Woo-hoo! Good for you, I agree with everything you just said. I too find it intensely irritating when American/Western cultural practices are deemed unIslamic or haram, but all of the haram Arab or Indonesian or Indian etc. practices are overlooked. Some people here think that you have to act exactly as the Arabs do and if not then you're being fully Muslim. My husband told me it's haram to pray in pants. Mind you, loose long pants, not butt-tight jeans! Can you or anyone else shed light on that one? I've seen truckloads of women praying in pants in the masjids in California and my husband looked at me like I said they were all praying without wearing scarves. It's interesting how people pay attention to minute details that are not necessarily as important as other details, like improving your actual faith, praying on time, etc. I just feel like people over here are focusing so much on the little practices and rituals instead of actually being spiritual, are they subconsciously trying to avoid it?