QUOTE(tito @ Mar 8 2008, 09:10 AM)

You have no idea about MY particular life...so once again, don't make this personal, and don't make any assumptions. I've done absolutely nothing to make any derogatory comment about you, and I have not made this personal despite the repeated attacks by a handful of posters.
Tito, you keep refusing to address any questions about your situation or your professional experience. Which is fine, it is of course your prerogative. However, stop with the "in my professional experience" crap. If you refuse to discuss where your experience comes from, then you don't get to legitimize your arguments based on your experience. Nothing you have said yet indicates any experience past what the typical clerk or VJ member would know. So either put up or shut up.
QUOTE
The harsh reality is, once again, that these threads are FULL of examples of really bad situations...perhaps for the immigrant; perhaps for the USC; perhaps for both. Without knowing the other side of the story, it's not really fair to jump on a sympathetic bandwagon especially when the likelihood is in many of these cases, which are representative of what happens in a practice that has as its emphasis immigration issues, is that the other side of the story is equally as compelling and in many cases the immigrant crying 'foul' is hardly a victim at all.
And yet you continue to only address the one side of the case. You say there are two sides, but inevitably (in tito world) the one side of the case is the immigrant screaming abuse. That's not 2 sides, tito. That's the same side of a very ugly and inaccurate
opinion.
QUOTE
I feel that it's important to bring that possibility to the attention of those who buy into the victim claim hook, line and sinker. Plain and simple. You don't agree with the assessment, that's fine! You don't like how I say it, that's fine too! But this incessant personal attack? Well, it doesn't bother me in the least. Everyone is free to stumble around in the dark tilting at windmills. There is sound reason that is being overlooked in the process.
For someone who isn't bothered by personal attacks, you sure bring them up often enough, and even manage to lob a few out to the "windmill tilters." (By the way, you might actually want to read
Don Quixote, where your quote comes from. You might get a better idea of what tilting at windmills actually means...and then you'll
laugh!QUOTE
Sometimes an orange may, indeed, be an orange. But when the orange being complained of in the majority of cases turns out to be a loaf of bread, one ought take away the wrapper before rendering a judgment. It just so happes that this forum IS in the bakery, no matter how orange it may seem.
You know tito, a bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.
QUOTE
My focus is not on the negative, per se, it has more to do with an alternative perspective that is being overlooked repeatedly. This forum deals with a lot of negative things happening, and life isn't all warm and fuzzy under the circumstances.
Well...sorry but your view *is* a negative view. And you know what? That would be fine if you had whatchacall an objective viewpoint. If you were bashing the USC as often (or hell, even at all) as you bash the immigrant, at least you'd be honestly negative. But time and time again you paint them with the broadest, nastiest brush you can find. That's why I keep saying you have an agenda. You keep saying there are 2 sides, but you say it like when one political party acknowledges that voters really have a choice, and say something like "you can vote for America or you can vote for the terrorists." You would have us believe that the 2 sides of the coin are the pure and holy USC, and the evil and money-grubbing immigrant. You present a false argument, and that's why--except for the occasional minion who shows up in your defense (and they're hillarious with their lack of puncuation and their bold-facing, don't get me wrong)--everyone here is always jumping in the middle of your crap.