QUOTE
And for those of you out there pissed off about my "generalization of Russians as arrogant and indifferent" you need to remember that a generalization doesn't mean that every single person is exactly this way. It "generalizes" them into a certain category. If you don't fit in that category good. But can you not make a generalization of some sort? (Any subject?) And once again, if I'm wrong in my generalization please explain to me why.
Slim, you are truly a god amongst men. I agree with almost everything you have to say, including your "Make a wish" argument, on which you are entirely correct.
However, I think you're a bit off with how you are using/defining a generalization.
NOT a generalization: Americans are fat.
IS a generalization: Most Americans are fat. Americans tend to be fatties. In general, Americans are fat. Americans are generally fat. Studies show that....
That said, generalizations, like their much-aligned cousin, stereotypes, are a USEFUL AND NECESSARY human feature that allows them to survive and evolve.
Stereotype: tigers are generous.
Gets mentally translated as "all tigers are dangerous". ARE all tigers dangerous? No. Is it good personal policy to assume they are? You betcha.
Applying this to a more typical situation.... woman walking down the street one night, sees three black guys walking toward her from the other direction - maybe doing nothing other than chatting amongst themselves as they walk down the street.
Stereotype: young black men are dangerous.
Action: cross the street, reach hand in purse, cock gun, just in case.
Result: woman feels safer. Blacks cry racism, rally against the evils of white-dominated society.
The catch: Oops! The woman is a black woman!!
Does the catch change anything? Does the charge of racism go away? How can a black woman possibly be racist against black men?
Isn't it possible that the stereotype "young black men are dangerous" and taking action to guard against it a prudent thing to do, regardless of one's own colour or even gender? Look at the result again. Woman feels safer, the black men feel offended. Once again, is she really responsible for their feelings? How can that be? She has no control over how they choose to feel or not feel. What she DOES have control over is whether or not she crosses the street. This is all she has done. How someone else feels about her crossing the street is really none of her business, concern or otherwise.
Stereotype: students that do well in high school will do well in college
Action: give preferential admissions treatment to HS students with a high GPA
Result: other students do not get into college, there are only so many spots available
How valid is this stereotype? How "fair" is the result?
Stereotype: only those who graduate from medical school & residency can be a qualified doctor
Action: only allow such people to practice medicine
Result: lots of people with interest in being a doctor but don't have time/money for school are excluded (even if, through "self education", they may have more knowledge than a med school graduate)
How valid is this stereotype? How "fair" is the result?
Stereotypes come in all kinds of flavours and levels of validity. However, they are based on observation, data and beliefs, just like pretty much anything else humans think about. They are also useful and necessary for humans to survive.
People shouldn't be all up in arms about stereotypes (generalizations), but they (you, Slim) should be clear about the language involved when declaring one. "Russians are arrogant" may be a generalization in your mind, but it clearly doesn't communicate to others that way - otherwise this sprout from the thread wouldn't have happened. I think a more successful way of communicating your message may be, "Many Russians are arrogant." On the other hand, such a statement doesn't really say much. Many people of whatever nationality you might wish to specify are arrogant too. Big deal. So what to do? "Russians tend to be arrogant?" Maybe a little better I guess. The other approach is for the person receiving the communication to try to understand the frame of mind of the sender. Work a little if you want to understand what someone else is trying to tell you.
FWIW, I don't believe Russians are any more arrogant than anyone else. Look at the Bush administration, U.S. foreign policy for the last 150 years and our plethora of religious people who insist that they have insight as to the "one pure truth" and that if you don't think like they do, you're either going to be in trouble with "god" or they are fully justified in killing you for general purposes. Arrogance abounds - the Russians have no special skills in this area.
Cheers!
AKDiver