QUOTE(Matt85 @ Jun 17 2008, 12:44 AM)

QUOTE(Jamericanlove @ Jun 16 2008, 06:42 AM)

Hi Matt85,
I just wanted to tell you in fact that you are incorrect. When the soldiers are overseas fighting in a war or wven at home going through training they are already under high stress levels. Their minds must be focused at all times because that makes the difference between life and death for them and their fellow soldiers in many situations.
A soldier having to worry about when he will see his or her spouse and about matters related to immigration IS a matter of DOD interest because they need them functioning and their higest levels.
At the end of the day it's NOT about 'the visa'....it's about getting their spouse at home as soon as possible so they can feel more at ease.
I imagine if you are not, and have never been in a military relationship it might be difficult to grasp. It's much easier to deal with a prolonged separation if your spouse is doing desk work all day than knowing they are getting shot at and blown up on a regular basis.
I'm not going to speak any more on the matter as it is apparently very touchy. I think our time would be better spent helping, encouraging and assisting each other in our quest to be with our loved ones regardless of the way we choose to do it.
I'm sorry, but a military member being with his/her loved one is not vital to our nation's security. Any claim as such is completely outrageous.
Let's be clear, military expedites for deployment reasons are completely valid.
But now we are talking about just a general expedite for a military member for the reason of "National Interest".
I'm curious how these commanders, who are signing off on these "military" expedites, are wording these papers to reflect that reuniting loved ones is a national interest.
For perspective, say 100 military people apply for an expedite. Lets say 50 are deploying, and 50 are just trying to get one because they are military members. If any of those that are not deploying get expedited faster, it is a great disservice to those who are going to be deploying into Iraq/Afghanistan. This much should be obvious, right?
National interest entails accounting for our nuclear stockpiles, helping Americans affected by natural distasters, etc. Things of that scale. Not speeding up immigration because a soldier misses his loved one. No other way to spin it.
Matt
Dear All,
Firstly Hello, I have not seen this thread before and wanted to introduce myself as a wife of an active duty US soldier (I do't like Military Spouse as a term - It sounds like I married the military and not my husband, although I realise that this effectively means I married the military!!!

)
Matt,
I can appreciate your point but it is not one that I can agree with. There are a few issues that as a none military spouse you will probably not be aware of and I thought I might bring them to your attention in the interest of discussion:
1. Military members are often away on field training with no access to phone, email or regular mail. The length of time can vary from a week to several weeks. And you can bet that this training will happen several times a year generally when you are waiting for an all important notice or packet. Personally, my husband and I have lost 3 months due to these particular circumstances.
2. Generally, military members do not work 9-5 jobs so getting to the post office, obtaining copy documentation, making the endless calls to the USCIS and NVC is difficult. Lower ranks have even bigger problems as they may need to get "permission" to do these things during normal working hours.
3. Divorce in the military is at a higher rate than the general population so you need to have a very strong relationship to cope with long seperations, regular moves and irregular work patterns. This relationship cannot be built up over the couple of months you might get prior to your spouse deploying especially as if he (she) has already receive orders to deploy as you can be sure that their mind will be focused on deployment not curling up on the sofa with newly arrived spouse!!!!
4. My final point is that when your spouse arrives you know that you will never have to spend this much time apart again. You know that when they go to work, generally, they will be home for dinner, weekends will be yours, conversations can be forever face-to-face. Military spouses know that their husband (wife) will be gone several weeks a year if not for a full year or more, we know that dinner will not always be eaten together (despite the fact you made it as you he was on the way ome an hour ago!), we know that our time as a couple, a family is only our own until the phone rings or orders arrive. We know that one day we may need to stand and watch our beloved partner walk away and deep down know that we may never see them again, we will want to run after them and say "don't go" but know that is just not something we can do, we know that nights will be spent lay awake one phone under the pillow, another by the bed and a mobile phone (or two) "just in case". As military spouses we know what we "signed up" to so I am not asking for sympathy just the compassion to understand that for every day a military wife spends away from her husband is a day that could have been lived together, a day that she may not get the opportunity to make up for over the coming years. A day lost forever.
So is the expediting of our cases really so very wrong? I am sure many people will say it is, but as the husbands & wives of the military we will disagree in strongest terms.
Regards
Emma