Thanks Kathryn. I really couldn't be bothered to respond because it was obvious there were huge misconceptions in all areas.
BTW, DP, the "past-life issues" was in reference to the antiquated thinking. Thoughts of forced labour and 19th century coal mine workers sprang immediately to mind.
BTW, DP, the "past-life issues" was in reference to the antiquated thinking. Thoughts of forced labour and 19th century coal mine workers sprang immediately to mind.
But it's hardly "forced labor," Krikit. Nobody is making anyone else work for any company in particular. You are free to choose who you wish to work for, provided you have the qualifications, of course. If IBM is being a "slave driver" then why not go work for Hewlett-Packard instead? If someone is too worried about "rocking the boat" then that's not a company issue, it's a personal one.
At no point did I say that anyone was forcing anyone into labour. I said that your words brought those thoughts into my mind. That does not make it reality.
2. You're right. If some sort of regulation was enforced, many companies would learn how to make it work or go under. How would they do that? They'd fire as many "unnecessary" workers as possible so they keep their business running and earn a profit. That's how it works. Unless you want the government to enact a law stating that companies can't even lay off their own employees. If that occurred, then we'd be nothing be a nation of freelancers. No one would want to own and run a business. Why hire someone when you'd have virtually no ability to fire them as well?
Companies do that now. Earning a profit is why they're in business. Employers don't keep employees on the books if they are surplus to requirements or they need to bring about cost-saving measures. Unless, of course, those employees belong to a Union. Unions bring your last line about "virtually no ability to fire them" into reality.
Honestly, I wouldn't be too thrilled about that. Why should I have to pay for someone I don't know (or at least, know well) simply because they decided they wanted a kid or two or three and so on? It's their child(ren)! Let them pay! I'll pay for mine; they can pay for theirs! That seems fair to me. If they can't afford kids, then you know what they should do? Not have any at that time. That's the smart and simple solution. It's better for everyone all around.
As for sick days, I agree with you -- if someone is taking a ton of sick days off, they're either faking it or far too ill to be of any use to the company. In either event, they're costing the business money and not getting their work done. That's probably one of the best reasons right there for a limited number of sick days.
As for sick days, I agree with you -- if someone is taking a ton of sick days off, they're either faking it or far too ill to be of any use to the company. In either event, they're costing the business money and not getting their work done. That's probably one of the best reasons right there for a limited number of sick days.
Let's look at this realistically. How much of a problem do you think Canada has with this perceived burden on the taxpayer? Do you think that Canadians would begin to complain and start a movement to have these policies overturned if there was solid statistical information proving this system is a detriment to the taxpayer, business, and society? Of course they would. Do you hear any whispers of a problem coming out of Canada? Of course you don't. The system works.
Prices are higher in Canada, despite the fact the U.S. and Canadian dollar can be equal in value or one worth slightly more than other on any given day of the week. My wife regularly complains about this, since given the exchange rate, prices shouldn't be so different, but they are still. I just bought a brand new hardcover book. It was $26 USD and $35 CAD. I just checked XE.com and the exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian dollar, as of April 24, 2008 is $26.00 USD equals $26.38 CAD. As you can see, the difference is so minimal, it's barely worth considering; however, publishers are somehow getting away with charging an extra NINE DOLLARS for the same book. That's before any extra taxes are added on too.
Yes, Canadians pay higher taxes than Americans. But they also receive acceptable compensatory benefits from those taxes. Yes, some items are more expensive. But, then again, the standard of living and the average income for comparable positions is much higher in Canada than in the US. That is why you have a cost of living factor. Just because some items are more expensive in Canada does not mean that there are not heavily inflated costs in the US. I find the US system of business much more costly than Canada for certain items and services. Canada and the US are not the same country and do not operate in the same manner. For instance, Canada can balance its budget. The US, however, continues to operate at a deficit year after year after year. Canada does not see imprisonment of its citizens as a revenue-generating business or allow prison placement and expansion to stimulate economy in economically-depressed areas.
*pause*
You know, I'm going to stop there. I generally don't engage in discussions such as this with unknown entities on a message board. VJ is where I come for information and to engage in light-hearted repartee with some of its members. I do not wish that to change.
Have a great weekend everyone.
