QUOTE(StillThePrettiest @ Apr 10 2008, 02:02 PM)

QUOTE(mox @ Apr 10 2008, 09:56 PM)

QUOTE(Scott and Marta @ Apr 10 2008, 01:37 PM)

I did. A few pages back.
yes, you did... I told Dave about that, and he snorted and said 'wasn't that a bit presumptuous of him?!'

So basically, any kind of meetup in the future is gonna be
awk-waaaard.QUOTE(StillThePrettiest @ Apr 10 2008, 02:02 PM)

well, make mine 'muuuuuuuummmmm!' and you might get closer to the truth

plus it might be weird to live in a house with a line painted down the middle

That would be so awesome. "And I'd like you to meet my wife, who is also my evil twin sister. You can shake her hand but you'll need to apply for a visitor's visa to StillThePrettiestvania first."
QUOTE
sounds like the K-1 forum

LMAO!
QUOTE(babybluesusie @ Apr 10 2008, 02:05 PM)

you know what really
grinds my gears????
when people reply to a post and put their comment ON TOP of the post(s) they are replying to...how in the hell does that make ANY sense at all?!?!?! i read you reply, and then have no idea WTF you are talking about, so now i have to scroll down and read the post(s) you are replying to...THEN i need to scroll back up again to read your reply once more, because after taking the time to read the other post(s), i have now forgotten what the hell your reply was :sigh:

Y'know...back in the early days of the internet (*waves cane around*) it was considered bad form to post your reply at the bottom of a quote. The reason being is that if you were keeping up on the conversation, you really only needed to see the most recent reply. For anyone trying to catch up, they just had to scroll down for as many quotes as they'd missed.
If you think about it, the way we do it now is counter-intuitive. In long lists of quotes you're always scrolling to the bottom. Which leads to calls for people to please trim their quotes, etc.
QUOTE(Jeraly @ Apr 10 2008, 02:05 PM)

*gasps*
So lenient!! Now come on - where's the real StP?!?!?!?
ut-upshay!
ut-upshay!