Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: This is a serious question.....to all waiting
VisaJourney.com > General Family Based Immigration Topics > Removing Conditions on Residency General Discussion

Pages: 1, 2
MichelleandCraig
As per the topic title, I don't wish to upset anyone....but I do have a genuine question, as I really can't understand the point of everyone getting all upset and impatient at the removing of conditions taking so long.

I mean...we are TOGETHER at this point....and all we are really doing is waiting. Most of us have the receipt already, so the GC has been extended, so the PR can do whatever he/she could before with no interruption....what's the big issue?

When we were all waiting for approvals to be *reunited* THAT I could understand...but I just don't see why people get all riled because it's taken so long (even a year, etc) to get a new GC.

To those who might say...I don't want to be in limbo or I want to just move on with my life and not worry about immigration...you're not in any sort of "limbo" and once you have that receipt, there's nothing you DO have to worry about. Get the bio letter, go do it, and then wait some more! mad.gif wink.gif Wait, wait, wait...the USCIS theme.

Anyway, I do realize, with the paragraph above, no one actually even said that laughing.gif I was just trying to "preanswer," I guess, responses I thought might be forthcoming.

Again, no offense intended....just honest bewilderment! Comments?? star_smile.gif Michelle
thea
Quite honestly? I'm once again at that point today where I would like to just throw everything at USCIS. Give me my new Greencard!!!!! I've waited for half a year - yes, I realize that the processing times for Vermont are still shown as March 2007. So I have a long way to go still.
I am writing this from Frankfurt airport and I am getting sick and tired of the hoops they make you jump through just to get back home to the US. United clearly doesn't understand the extension letter. And I already know that on the other end I will not be greeted with a friendly "welcome home" - no, it will be back to secondary inspection where I will have to wait for an hour or longer just to have someone call their supervisor again because the immigration officer too doesn't understand the extension letter and what to do with it. I've made this experience a couple of times over the last 2 months.
There is nothing I can do to move the process along - but I can get upset to at least vent my frustration a little bit innocent.gif
MichelleandCraig
and my question wasn't meant to be a "don't vent" or "don't be frustrated" thing either....I am just, honestly, wondering.

Like, in your example, using the extension letter is causing you problems. (sorry about that!!!!) but for most people...using the letter seems to be no problem/no big deal....in and out as if they had the green card.

So...for those people...who haven't had trouble with, say, the extension letter....

For YOU...what is the big deal about the wait? Again, *simply curious* smile.gif M.
spi9959
QUOTE(MichelleandCraig @ Dec 20 2007, 05:29 AM) *
As per the topic title, I don't wish to upset anyone....but I do have a genuine question, as I really can't understand the point of everyone getting all upset and impatient at the removing of conditions taking so long.

I mean...we are TOGETHER at this point....and all we are really doing is waiting. Most of us have the receipt already, so the GC has been extended, so the PR can do whatever he/she could before with no interruption....what's the big issue?

When we were all waiting for approvals to be *reunited* THAT I could understand...but I just don't see why people get all riled because it's taken so long (even a year, etc) to get a new GC.

To those who might say...I don't want to be in limbo or I want to just move on with my life and not worry about immigration...you're not in any sort of "limbo" and once you have that receipt, there's nothing you DO have to worry about. Get the bio letter, go do it, and then wait some more! mad.gif wink.gif Wait, wait, wait...the USCIS theme.

Anyway, I do realize, with the paragraph above, no one actually even said that laughing.gif I was just trying to "preanswer," I guess, responses I thought might be forthcoming.

Again, no offense intended....just honest bewilderment! Comments?? star_smile.gif Michelle



I suspect one of the reasons is that the process is not completed despite the issuance of the extension of the receipt --- receipt of the green card is closure. Also, there is the possibility of further snags and problems until the process is completed by the receipt of the green card. Additionally, let me ask you this. Why do you think the issuance of the receipt is not the end of the process from the government's perspective?
MichelleandCraig
What do you mean why do I think the receipt isn't the end of it? To me, that's obvious...becasue they still haven't checked over your evidence yet. Yes, I see the reason for your answer...possible future snags, etc...and that is a very good point.

I guess I just don't worry much about that. We have a legit marriage (as most everyone here) and we have plenty of evidence...perhaps more than some, I'm sure much less than others. I guess I'm just not worried because they have no reason to not allow Craig to stay so I don't fret about it.

I do understand your point, however. Thanks for the answer...everyone is different with worry levels, etc. smile.gif M.
margyw
I did not realise until I was approved just how relieved I would be. To be able to forget about immigration for the next 10 years is great!! I will be applying for citizenship, but that is my choice, otherwise I could just sit back and not worry about what I have to do next,  for a while.
When I went to England recently, it would of been easier to have the 10 year card instead of the extension letter, cos not everyone at the airports understand what it meant! and a few times they had to call someone in the know! I think it feels like a sense of freedom, things you would normally just take for granted.
Ofcourse there was always the worry of a RFE and the messing about of maybe having to get yet another extension letter!
Yes John and I have stayed together throughout this, not like the K1 but it is still at the back of your mind.The other thing is I can actually have my driving license extened instead of having to keep renewing it kicking.gif
tweety
For TSC it seems that they officially lie with their published processing times, in their replies to senator inquiries, in their replies to service requests.... Every single information request produced a different processing time projection. This IS what is making me mad about waiting and waiting, getting lied at and not knowing if and when my case, which I paid good money for a long time ago, receives any service at all. BTW, my case has been out of official processing times for a good 3 months now...

And while in theory it is correct that you shouldn't have any problems with the NOA1 alone, there is numerous reports where it has caused problems in the past - e.g. DLs not granted on the grounds of NOA1. It also causes problems when applying for new jobs (and not all employers know all the details about removing conditions - and I am yet to encounter that brave person to lecture their prospective employer on immigration law).
spi9959
QUOTE(MichelleandCraig @ Dec 20 2007, 07:58 AM) *
I guess I just don't worry much about that. We have a legit marriage (as most everyone here) and we have plenty of evidence...perhaps more than some, I'm sure much less than others. I guess I'm just not worried because they have no reason to not allow Craig to stay so I don't fret about it.

I do understand your point, however. Thanks for the answer...everyone is different with worry levels, etc. smile.gif M.


I'm guessing that most people applying for green cards believe that they have a legitimate marriage and that they have sufficient evidence to prove it. However, the criteria for the awarding of the green card is not based upon the submitters' beliefs in regard to the sufficiency and/or quality of evidence, but on the governmental reviewers' evaluations and determinations. I have read of people submitting a multitude of evidence receiving RFEs, for example, for not including tax transcipts although they submitted 1040s. For many of us, the process is worrisome and the worry doesn't cease until we have the green card firmly in hand.
Parivar CSK
What annoys me is the biometrics game we have had to play with USCIS. We haven't even been able to move on from that point yet. We waited awhile to get a biometrics notice, then he went and got it done, then got another biometrics letter because his fingerprints didn't work...went again, and then got an RFE because they didn't work again. Now we had to send in a police report. So we aren't able to just sit back and wait yet, due to the fingerprint problem. So we are constantly dealing with USCIS so far, no just waiting around for it to happen. It seems every couple weeks we are getting a letter asking for something else and it's getting old! tongue.gif

If that part gets resolved, we are fine waiting for the approval. It just can get irritating because it reminds you how inconsistent USCIS service centers are. People who sent in their apps months after us, got their bio appt really fast and already got approved, while we are waiting in biometrics limbo. LOL SO it's hard not to get annoyed about it sometimes. And then there are those of us lucky to get transferred to CSC while many at TSC and others are waiting much much longer. It's the inconsistency of it all that's aggrevating.

Also Suj feels a little uncomfortable visiting India with only the receipt and stamp in his passport(which he'd have to get at our local office) and would much rather have the actual card before he visits India again so they don't question his status over in India.
Cassie
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 09:31 AM) *
For TSC it seems that they officially lie with their published processing times, in their replies to senator inquiries, in their replies to service requests.... Every single information request produced a different processing time projection. This IS what is making me mad about waiting and waiting, getting lied at and not knowing if and when my case, which I paid good money for a long time ago, receives any service at all. BTW, my case has been out of official processing times for a good 3 months now...

And while in theory it is correct that you shouldn't have any problems with the NOA1 alone, there is numerous reports where it has caused problems in the past - e.g. DLs not granted on the grounds of NOA1. It also causes problems when applying for new jobs (and not all employers know all the details about removing conditions - and I am yet to encounter that brave person to lecture their prospective employer on immigration law).



That is what makes me mad too. I don't mind waiting, I really don't, but I have a big problem with the outright lies TSC has been giving us, and that because we applied before June 30, we sit and wait and watch others get transferred and get their cards with little to no difficulty. I have a problem with the fact that I will probably have to apply for citizenship to get my I-751 moved along, and will have to waste time and energy to go get the extension stamp to extend the extension letter.
MichelleandCraig
QUOTE(spi9959 @ Dec 20 2007, 07:38 AM) *
QUOTE(MichelleandCraig @ Dec 20 2007, 07:58 AM) *
I guess I just don't worry much about that. We have a legit marriage (as most everyone here) and we have plenty of evidence...perhaps more than some, I'm sure much less than others. I guess I'm just not worried because they have no reason to not allow Craig to stay so I don't fret about it.

I do understand your point, however. Thanks for the answer...everyone is different with worry levels, etc. smile.gif M.


I'm guessing that most people applying for green cards believe that they have a legitimate marriage and that they have sufficient evidence to prove it. However, the criteria for the awarding of the green card is not based upon the submitters' beliefs in regard to the sufficiency and/or quality of evidence, but on the governmental reviewers' evaluations and determinations. I have read of people submitting a multitude of evidence receiving RFEs, for example, for not including tax transcipts although they submitted 1040s. For many of us, the process is worrisome and the worry doesn't cease until we have the green card firmly in hand.



Yes, I am fully aware that the decision is with the adjudicator and not me. tongue_ss.gif and yes, I am *very* certain we have sufficient evidence to prove that we have a legit relationship. I may yet have to submit more of that proof to prove it....but I am confident we will be fine in the end.

I have already stated agreement with your last sentence....different people have different worry levels. I fully get that and was not insinuating people are wrong for being worried until the GC is in hand.....I just wanted to understand it better. Through the responses, I am...so thanks! smile.gif M.
burs
Let me put it to you this way:

1. My wife can't apply for a new job because HR people are not familiar with the concept of extension letter and would rather err on the side of safety and hire someone with an unexpired greencard. That's forgone career advancement and salary.

2. When travelling to Europe, my wife is only able to receive week-long visa's instead of long-term Schengen visa because the European Embassies are not convinced that my wife will receive a 10-year card after the review of her case. Hence, she may stay in Europe as an illegal (that's what they think). That's extra expenditures on visas that we have to put up with.

3. USCIS and us had an agreement - I pay you money, you devote a few minutes to reviewing my application (not approve, but just review) within the amount of time that you specify officially. The amount of time specified by TSC - 7 months (April 7th). It's been 9 months for us and even more for others on this forum. That's misinformation (intentional or not) that leads to missed investment opportunities. I could've parked this money elsewhere at a possible profit or just personal utility.

This is a picknick that I paid for, but wasn't invited to. So pardon me if I am a little irritated.
Kathryn41
One other concern . . . while you are still 'waiting' for the process, there is still an opportunity for something to go wrong. You have spent all of this time and money and frustration - and you know it could still all disappear into a tangle of immigration legalities if something happens - something simple like not receiving an RFE and your file gets denied, etc. The 'safety' of your happiness together is still in someone else's hands and you are at their beck and call. You know there is no compassion or sympathy for human errors or circumstances, so until you KNOW that everything is complete and you have that 10 year green card in your hands, you know you are and your happiness are at risk. That is why I get impatient - out of fear of what could go wrong still.
MichelleandCraig
burs....you really don't have to do the "so pardon me if" thing...

I have stated or insinuated numerous times that it is anyone's right to feel however they feel...I just wondered what the deal was. I've gotten some good answers...so thank you! smile.gif
Germerican
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 07:31 AM) *
and I am yet to encounter that brave person to lecture their prospective employer on immigration law).


I did! devil.gif Well, it was my current employer but still, I had to basically do the dirty work for them and find out what my options were. They had no clue about USCIS or the I-9.

I was told I'd have to resign my position as soon as my conditional GC expired, if I could not provide a copy of my new GC. blink.gif

After doing all the necessary research (this was pre VJ times, otherwise I would have known right away) I sent them an email, asking if certain rules applied to me, so I could keep my job.

If I hadn't looked into it, I would have lost my job.

This is the email I sent to HR:

QUOTE
Peggy,

In your email of 9/21 you said I could contact you if I had any questions. I do have some questions regarding the I-9 Form. For your convenience I attached a copy of this form to this email.

Due to an increase in processing fees on July 30th, 2007, the USCIS has received a tremendous number of applications and thus, is currently behind schedule with the initial processing of these applications, which would include my own application as well. Having said that, the likelihood that I will receive the necessary Notice of Action, which would extend my current Permanent Resident Card for an additional year, before the expiration of my current card, is very slim. For clarification purposes I would like to state that the expiration of my current Permanent Resident Card does not change my status as a Permanent Legal Resident as well as my authorization to work.

In order to avoid having to resign my employment I wanted to inquire if there were any other possibilities for me to prove my legal authorization to work?

According to Form I-9, Section 2 - Employer :

... "Employers must complete Section 2 by examining evidence of identity and employment eligibility withing three (3) business days, they must present a receipt for the application of the date employment begins. If employees are authorized to work, but are unable to present the required document(s) within three business days, they must present a receipt for the application of the document(s) within three business days and the actual document(s) within ninety (90) days. " ...

Would this apply to my situation? I have already provided a copy of my application, together with the mailing receipt. Once the return receipt arrives, I would also be able to provide that as proof of application.

Furthermore, according to Form I-9, Section 3 - Updating and Reverification:

..."Employers must reverify employment eligibility of their employees on or before the expiration date recorded in Section 1. Employers CANNOT specify which document(s) they will accept from an employee."... "if a current employee's work authorization is about to expire (reverification), complete Block B and:" ... "examine any document that reflects that the employee is authorized to work in the U.S. (see List A or C)."

Under List C of the "Lists of Acceptable Documents" (Page 3, Form I-9), Item 1. states a "U.S. social security card issued by the Social Security Administration (other than a card stating it is not valid for employment)" to be an acceptable document that establishes employment eligibility.

As a Permanent Legal Resident I can request a Social Security Card without the annotation "Valid for Work Only with DHS Authorization". If I can provide said Social Security Card, would this be an acceptable form of proof of employment eligibility?

I hope there is a possibility for me to avoid having to resign my employment, should I not receive the needed document, which would establish my authorization to work, in time.

Should you have any questions for me in the meantime, please feel free to contact me as well.

Thank you,

Andreas
Germerican
QUOTE(burs @ Dec 20 2007, 10:05 AM) *
Let me put it to you this way:

1. My wife can't apply for a new job because HR people are not familiar with the concept of extension letter and would rather err on the side of safety and hire someone with an unexpired greencard. That's forgone career advancement and salary.


Burs, see my last post prior to this one. Many HR Departments seem to have absolutely no clue what the I-9 is all about. I would see this as grounds for a lawsuit, due to discrimination. mad.gif

To all employers out there. It's not that hard. Just take a closer look at that damned I-9 and you'd know how you can and cannot hire. devil.gif
sarah and hicham
QUOTE(stina&suj @ Dec 20 2007, 07:07 AM) *
What annoys me is the biometrics game we have had to play with USCIS. We haven't even been able to move on from that point yet. We waited awhile to get a biometrics notice, then he went and got it done, then got another biometrics letter because his fingerprints didn't work...went again, and then got an RFE because they didn't work again. Now we had to send in a police report. So we aren't able to just sit back and wait yet, due to the fingerprint problem. So we are constantly dealing with USCIS so far, no just waiting around for it to happen. It seems every couple weeks we are getting a letter asking for something else and it's getting old! tongue.gif
If that part gets resolved, we are fine waiting for the approval. It just can get irritating because it reminds you how inconsistent USCIS service centers are. People who sent in their apps months after us, got their bio appt really fast and already got approved, while we are waiting in biometrics limbo. LOL SO it's hard not to get annoyed about it sometimes. And then there are those of us lucky to get transferred to CSC while many at TSC and others are waiting much much longer. It's the inconsistency of it all that's aggrevating.

Also Suj feels a little uncomfortable visiting India with only the receipt and stamp in his passport(which he'd have to get at our local office) and would much rather have the actual card before he visits India again so they don't question his status over in India.


This happened to us at the AOS stage. Man, what a pain! Good luck with the police report, it was really easy to get here and we picked it up the same day.
tweety
I just think it makes a huge difference if you already have the job, and the company wants something from you (i.e. valid GC), as opposed to when you are dealing with a prospective future employer. In the latter case you are undoubtedly in a way weaker position - as you want employment from them, while they still have a pool of candidates to fall back on, should you (the one with questionable papers) not be able to produce the desired papers on time.
You get the difference?

QUOTE(Germerican @ Dec 20 2007, 11:38 AM) *
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 07:31 AM) *
and I am yet to encounter that brave person to lecture their prospective employer on immigration law).


I did! devil.gif Well, it was my current employer but still, I had to basically do the dirty work for them and find out what my options were. They had no clue about USCIS or the I-9.

I was told I'd have to resign my position as soon as my conditional GC expired, if I could not provide a copy of my new GC. blink.gif

After doing all the necessary research (this was pre VJ times, otherwise I would have known right away) I sent them an email, asking if certain rules applied to me, so I could keep my job.

If I hadn't looked into it, I would have lost my job.

This is the email I sent to HR:

QUOTE
Peggy,

In your email of 9/21 you said I could contact you if I had any questions. I do have some questions regarding the I-9 Form. For your convenience I attached a copy of this form to this email.

Due to an increase in processing fees on July 30th, 2007, the USCIS has received a tremendous number of applications and thus, is currently behind schedule with the initial processing of these applications, which would include my own application as well. Having said that, the likelihood that I will receive the necessary Notice of Action, which would extend my current Permanent Resident Card for an additional year, before the expiration of my current card, is very slim. For clarification purposes I would like to state that the expiration of my current Permanent Resident Card does not change my status as a Permanent Legal Resident as well as my authorization to work.

In order to avoid having to resign my employment I wanted to inquire if there were any other possibilities for me to prove my legal authorization to work?

According to Form I-9, Section 2 - Employer :

... "Employers must complete Section 2 by examining evidence of identity and employment eligibility withing three (3) business days, they must present a receipt for the application of the date employment begins. If employees are authorized to work, but are unable to present the required document(s) within three business days, they must present a receipt for the application of the document(s) within three business days and the actual document(s) within ninety (90) days. " ...

Would this apply to my situation? I have already provided a copy of my application, together with the mailing receipt. Once the return receipt arrives, I would also be able to provide that as proof of application.

Furthermore, according to Form I-9, Section 3 - Updating and Reverification:

..."Employers must reverify employment eligibility of their employees on or before the expiration date recorded in Section 1. Employers CANNOT specify which document(s) they will accept from an employee."... "if a current employee's work authorization is about to expire (reverification), complete Block B and:" ... "examine any document that reflects that the employee is authorized to work in the U.S. (see List A or C)."

Under List C of the "Lists of Acceptable Documents" (Page 3, Form I-9), Item 1. states a "U.S. social security card issued by the Social Security Administration (other than a card stating it is not valid for employment)" to be an acceptable document that establishes employment eligibility.

As a Permanent Legal Resident I can request a Social Security Card without the annotation "Valid for Work Only with DHS Authorization". If I can provide said Social Security Card, would this be an acceptable form of proof of employment eligibility?

I hope there is a possibility for me to avoid having to resign my employment, should I not receive the needed document, which would establish my authorization to work, in time.

Should you have any questions for me in the meantime, please feel free to contact me as well.

Thank you,

Andreas


Kazan' Tiger
Well as someone still waiting to be reunited. I don't even get a tizzy over that. Neither does my fiancée. Whining is not going to speed anything along any more than honking a horn in traffic jam. It only creates more useless anger and frustration. yes.gif

I know once my fiancée gets her, the USCIS can drag their feet all they want. She's here! It's not like they send your loved back to their native country in between each step. rolleyes.gif
Germerican
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 11:45 AM) *
I just think it makes a huge difference if you already have the job, and the company wants something from you (i.e. valid GC), as opposed to when you are dealing with a prospective future employer. In the latter case you are undoubtedly in a way weaker position - as you want employment from them, while they still have a pool of candidates to fall back on, should you (the one with questionable papers) not be able to produce the desired papers on time.
You get the difference?


I do get the point, however, if you are able to provide proper documentation, like in burs' case, (proper documentation does not mean a GC, it can also be a valid DL and a SSC w/o annotation, or an expired conditional GC with NOA, etc.) and they don't hire you based on the fact that you can't show them a valid GC, than that is discrimination in my opinion.

If I was looking for a job and a prospective employer told me they wouldn't hire me because I can't provide a valid GC as proof of employment eligibility (an that's what it's all about), I would take that I-9 and throw it in their face. After all, you have to proof that you are authorized to work, not your immigration status.
tweety
QUOTE(Kazan @ Dec 20 2007, 11:57 AM) *
Well as someone still waiting to be reunited. I don't even get a tizzy over that. Neither does my fiancée. Whining is not going to speed anything along any more than honking a horn in traffic jam. It only creates more useless anger and frustration. yes.gif

I know once my fiancée gets her, the USCIS can drag their feet all they want. She's here! It's not like they send your loved back to their native country in between each step. rolleyes.gif


How about you just wait till you get to our stage, and when your wife sits around at home for a couple of months because her DL expired and she can't get a new one, as well can't change jobs for a couple of months.... we shall talk again....
tweety
QUOTE(Germerican @ Dec 20 2007, 11:59 AM) *
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 11:45 AM) *
I just think it makes a huge difference if you already have the job, and the company wants something from you (i.e. valid GC), as opposed to when you are dealing with a prospective future employer. In the latter case you are undoubtedly in a way weaker position - as you want employment from them, while they still have a pool of candidates to fall back on, should you (the one with questionable papers) not be able to produce the desired papers on time.
You get the difference?


I do get the point, however, if you are able to provide proper documentation, like in burs' case, (proper documentation does not mean a GC, it can also be a valid DL and a SSC w/o annotation, or an expired conditional GC with NOA, etc.) and they don't hire you based on the fact that you can't show them a valid GC, than that is discrimination in my opinion.

If I was looking for a job and a prospective employer told me they wouldn't hire me because I can't provide a valid GC as proof of employment eligibility (an that's what it's all about), I would take that I-9 and throw it in their face. After all, you have to proof that you are authorized to work, not your immigration status.


Yeah, picking a fight with your future employer is a sure way to get hired.... and I doubt they would tell you that they didn't hire you because of your immigration status, of course they'd just pick something else... it's not like they're that stupid.
Germerican
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 12:02 PM) *
QUOTE(Germerican @ Dec 20 2007, 11:59 AM) *
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 11:45 AM) *
I just think it makes a huge difference if you already have the job, and the company wants something from you (i.e. valid GC), as opposed to when you are dealing with a prospective future employer. In the latter case you are undoubtedly in a way weaker position - as you want employment from them, while they still have a pool of candidates to fall back on, should you (the one with questionable papers) not be able to produce the desired papers on time.
You get the difference?


I do get the point, however, if you are able to provide proper documentation, like in burs' case, (proper documentation does not mean a GC, it can also be a valid DL and a SSC w/o annotation, or an expired conditional GC with NOA, etc.) and they don't hire you based on the fact that you can't show them a valid GC, than that is discrimination in my opinion.

If I was looking for a job and a prospective employer told me they wouldn't hire me because I can't provide a valid GC as proof of employment eligibility (an that's what it's all about), I would take that I-9 and throw it in their face. After all, you have to proof that you are authorized to work, not your immigration status.


Yeah, picking a fight with your future employer is a sure way to get hired.... and I doubt they would tell you that they didn't hire you because of your immigration status, of course they'd just pick something else... it's not like they're that stupid.


Most definately. Apparently that's what happened in burs' case. And yes, some employers are that stupid! After all some aren't even familiar with the I-9. A form that every new employee hast to fill out.

Why not pick a fight with a potential employer? Maybe it'll impress them to see how determined you are! wink.gif
lucyrich
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 09:45 AM) *
I just think it makes a huge difference if you already have the job, and the company wants something from you (i.e. valid GC), as opposed to when you are dealing with a prospective future employer. In the latter case you are undoubtedly in a way weaker position - as you want employment from them, while they still have a pool of candidates to fall back on, should you (the one with questionable papers) not be able to produce the desired papers on time.
You get the difference?


True, but when dealing with a potential future employer, especially one who has already told you they won't employ you, you've got a lot less to lose by filing a lawsuit. If they say they won't employ you, and they say the reason is that they require documentation in a form which the law says they are not allowed to require. then it'll be an easy lawsuit to win.
Kazan' Tiger
Well, I'm not too worried about those things. Plenty of ways to work under the table and a DL is good for 4 years. I hardly think any paper would take that long. Even if it does, big deal. I can find a way for her to get to work.

QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 01:00 PM) *
QUOTE(Kazan @ Dec 20 2007, 11:57 AM) *
Well as someone still waiting to be reunited. I don't even get a tizzy over that. Neither does my fiancée. Whining is not going to speed anything along any more than honking a horn in traffic jam. It only creates more useless anger and frustration. yes.gif

I know once my fiancée gets her, the USCIS can drag their feet all they want. She's here! It's not like they send your loved back to their native country in between each step. rolleyes.gif


How about you just wait till you get to our stage, and when your wife sits around at home for a couple of months because her DL expired and she can't get a new one, as well can't change jobs for a couple of months.... we shall talk again....
john_t_03
QUOTE
...
I mean...we are TOGETHER at this point....and all we are really doing is waiting. Most of us have the receipt already, so the GC has been extended, so the PR can do whatever he/she could before with no interruption....what's the big issue?
...
To those who might say...I don't want to be in limbo or I want to just move on with my life and not worry about immigration...you're not in any sort of "limbo" and once you have that receipt, there's nothing you DO have to worry about. Get the bio letter, go do it, and then wait some more! :angry: ;) Wait, wait, wait...the USCIS theme.
...


While I personally do take this process lightly and have learned not to check my case status every day, I disagree with a few assumptions you have made:

1. A lot of things are in limbo, including your very status in the US. USCIS might send you an rfe, invite you to another interview, or your application could fall through the cracks to be never found again. That RFE or interview notice might get lost in the mail (it happens) and your application can be denied and you could find yourself in removal proceedings. All of these might happen, because your residency is "conditional" and that still has a very heavy bearing on people.

2. A lot of people get stressed, because they don't have all the evidence required for 751, children's birth certificates if no children, lack of a lease or a mortgage, lack of financial documents. It is in fact quite possible to remain as a legal married couple while lacking these documents and face an RFE.

3. Some people don't even get their NOAs or renewal letters. They have no legal proof of their status, in case it's required for an ID, job, international travel, etc. This also causes a lot of stress.

Last, the people on these forums represent those that are in fact worried. Otherwise, there is not much reason to be on here. There are tens of thousands of people who are in a similar position, yet are not regulars on the internet forums. If you are not worried at all about the 751, what are "you" doing on this forum? :)
burs
Germerican,

Nothing happened in my wife's employment, I am sorry if I've thrown you off. She is currently employed and it took little effort to explain things to her current HR folks, they were understanding. And while she hasn't applied for a new job yet, it's pretty much a sure bet that if it comes down to two candidates and one of them having an expired green card (with the extension letter), that person is going to be at a disadvantage. I don't think there are any merits for a lawsuit here, however. Any company is interested in a steady employee. But what if that person's petition to remove conditions is denied and that person is deported. As a company you loose because you lost that employee and you haven't hired the other candidate who otherwise would not have had those problems. You can't blame them for having their doubts in hiring you. That's what I am talking about. It's not just the wait.

Kazan' dude - good luck with everything.
Kez/JWolf
QUOTE(burs @ Dec 20 2007, 01:50 PM) *
Germerican,

Nothing happened in my wife's employment, I am sorry if I've thrown you off. She is currently employed and it took little effort to explain things to her current HR folks, they were understanding. And while she hasn't applied for a new job yet, it's pretty much a sure bet that if it comes down to two candidates and one of them having an expired green card (with the extension letter), that person is going to be at a disadvantage. I don't think there are any merits for a lawsuit here, however. Any company is interested in a steady employee. But what if that person's petition to remove conditions is denied and that person is deported. As a company you loose because you lost that employee and you haven't hired the other candidate who otherwise would not have had those problems. You can't blame them for having their doubts in hiring you. That's what I am talking about. It's not just the wait.

Kazan' dude - good luck with everything.


Why would your wife need to even show a greencard to either a new employer or an existing employer..... to comply with the I-9 all she needs is her SSN card and a State ID or DL..... as long as the SSN card does not have the "Valid only with" on t then she is all set.... if she has not got a new SSN card after getting her greencard then she should go and get one ASAP....


Kez
Germerican
QUOTE(burs @ Dec 20 2007, 12:50 PM) *
it's pretty much a sure bet that if it comes down to two candidates and one of them having an expired green card (with the extension letter), that person is going to be at a disadvantage.


Don't provide your expired GC and extension letter as proof of employment eligibilty, but rather show them a valid drivers license and your social security card (without any annotations). That should put you right where the other candidate is and eliminate the disadvantages. wink.gif
tweety
QUOTE(Kazan @ Dec 20 2007, 12:30 PM) *
Well, I'm not too worried about those things. Plenty of ways to work under the table and a DL is good for 4 years. I hardly think any paper would take that long. Even if it does, big deal. I can find a way for her to get to work.

QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 01:00 PM) *
QUOTE(Kazan @ Dec 20 2007, 11:57 AM) *
Well as someone still waiting to be reunited. I don't even get a tizzy over that. Neither does my fiancée. Whining is not going to speed anything along any more than honking a horn in traffic jam. It only creates more useless anger and frustration. yes.gif

I know once my fiancée gets her, the USCIS can drag their feet all they want. She's here! It's not like they send your loved back to their native country in between each step. rolleyes.gif


How about you just wait till you get to our stage, and when your wife sits around at home for a couple of months because her DL expired and she can't get a new one, as well can't change jobs for a couple of months.... we shall talk again....




Yeah, working illegally ("under the table") is the way to go. Too bad I don't work in any profession that would allow for that. And I've had only a total of 3 DL's now in the past 3 1/2 years, and it will expire again next year May.... that much for your utopia of DLs being good for 4 years. I hope you never get a rough awakening from your dreams.... Keep sleeping.
pushbrk
QUOTE(MichelleandCraig @ Dec 20 2007, 01:29 AM) *
As per the topic title, I don't wish to upset anyone....but I do have a genuine question, as I really can't understand the point of everyone getting all upset and impatient at the removing of conditions taking so long.

I mean...we are TOGETHER at this point....and all we are really doing is waiting. Most of us have the receipt already, so the GC has been extended, so the PR can do whatever he/she could before with no interruption....what's the big issue?

When we were all waiting for approvals to be *reunited* THAT I could understand...but I just don't see why people get all riled because it's taken so long (even a year, etc) to get a new GC.

To those who might say...I don't want to be in limbo or I want to just move on with my life and not worry about immigration...you're not in any sort of "limbo" and once you have that receipt, there's nothing you DO have to worry about. Get the bio letter, go do it, and then wait some more! mad.gif wink.gif Wait, wait, wait...the USCIS theme.

Anyway, I do realize, with the paragraph above, no one actually even said that laughing.gif I was just trying to "preanswer," I guess, responses I thought might be forthcoming.

Again, no offense intended....just honest bewilderment! Comments?? star_smile.gif Michelle


I can't answer for anybody else or even my family, because we don't have the green card yet. When we do, it won't be conditional. K1 folks can't really do what we did, so it doesn't apply and many K3 folks won't want to do it either but I intentionally avoided removal of conditions. We simply planned to delay filing AOS until late enough that the second wedding anniversary would precede the AOS interview.

Our reasons were multiple. I suppose we could have had my wife and daughter's green cards in early 2007 but that would mean we would be in the removal of conditions phase during 2009. Our plan at the time was to move our primary residence to China in mid 2009, so we didn't want to be messing with USCIS during that time. Plans have changed now, and we probably won't make the move until late 2009 or early 2010.

Another reason for delaying was the expense. Neither wife or daughter was ready or needed to work right away and travel to anywhere outside the USA except to China was not planned. We did file EAD for my wife a year ago and about six months ago for her daughter. Now they both work.

We intended to file AOS in early October, 2007 so the interview would definitely be after November 30, 2007. The plans changed to avoid the increased fees. We ultimately filed in late July, hoping the big rush would delay the interview until December at the earliest. It's now set for January 24. The green cards will have 10 year expirations.

What I didn't realize in my plan was that filing more than a year after their medical was done in China, would have required a new medical here. As it is, we filed in time, so are only providing vaccination suppliments for the interview. I won't know until we get there whether they'll make them take a new medical. The local office responds by email saying that's up to the adjudicator at interview. That doesn't sound right to me, but I've no way of getting a second opinion before the interview.

Anyway, for those that could benefit by using this strategy, it may be a good one. It will not work even for all K3's and certainly no K1's.


Germerican
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 01:42 PM) *
QUOTE(Kazan @ Dec 20 2007, 12:30 PM) *
Well, I'm not too worried about those things. Plenty of ways to work under the table and a DL is good for 4 years. I hardly think any paper would take that long. Even if it does, big deal. I can find a way for her to get to work.

QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 01:00 PM) *
QUOTE(Kazan @ Dec 20 2007, 11:57 AM) *
Well as someone still waiting to be reunited. I don't even get a tizzy over that. Neither does my fiancée. Whining is not going to speed anything along any more than honking a horn in traffic jam. It only creates more useless anger and frustration. yes.gif

I know once my fiancée gets her, the USCIS can drag their feet all they want. She's here! It's not like they send your loved back to their native country in between each step. rolleyes.gif


How about you just wait till you get to our stage, and when your wife sits around at home for a couple of months because her DL expired and she can't get a new one, as well can't change jobs for a couple of months.... we shall talk again....




Yeah, working illegally ("under the table") is the way to go. Too bad I don't work in any profession that would allow for that. And I've had only a total of 3 DL's now in the past 3 1/2 years, and it will expire again next year May.... that much for your utopia of DLs being good for 4 years. I hope you never get a rough awakening from your dreams.... Keep sleeping.


I have to agree. The "plenty of ways to work under the table" comment is pretty stupid. Do you really want to go through all that trouble of obtaining a visa, only to have them sent your fiancée back when they catch her working illegally? If so, you might as well forget about the visa and just have her come over without a visa right away. (Disclaimer: This last comment is pure ironie!!!)

@tweety: I can understand your frustration and hope your case gets approved ASAP!
Germerican
QUOTE(pushbrk @ Dec 20 2007, 01:53 PM) *
Our plan at the time was to move our primary residence to China in mid 2009, so we didn't want to be messing with USCIS during that time.


How long are you planing to stay in China?
MichelleandCraig
j t 03...

smile.gif Hey. I'm on this forum (haven't been for quite a while, actually, aside from the occasional "pop on and say hi," because I was VERY worried in the beginning of our process in 04, and had tons of questions.

I'm specifically talking about Removing of Conditions here..not the entire process. I have never been worried about any part of this process, but I originally came to this forum to ask a question my husband (from UK) was concerned about....if we didn't receive our NOA1 receipt before his GC expiry (which we did) ...then what? So...there's your answer.

I think I have made it VERY clear numerous times that I'm aware everyone is entitled to their feelings...I just had a curiousity over it as I don't feel the same. I, PERSONALLY (nor Craig), don't feel in limbo, or whatever....because of this part of the process. Others have had different experiences which has made them FEEL, understandably, different. M.
MichelleandCraig
tweety, why do your DL expire so quickly??? Possibly your state...I dunno. Mine was good for 4 years when I first got it, but it recently changed to 8 years. As of my bday in 08 I will have to get a new one...haven't had to since 2000. It must be the state.... M.
tweety
QUOTE(MichelleandCraig @ Dec 20 2007, 02:47 PM) *
tweety, why do your DL expire so quickly??? Possibly your state...I dunno. Mine was good for 4 years when I first got it, but it recently changed to 8 years. As of my bday in 08 I will have to get a new one...haven't had to since 2000. It must be the state.... M.


The expiry date of the DL is the same as the expiry date of the immigration document provided (in theory all DMVs from most states should enforce this).
In my case it was EAD (1 year), conditional greencard (add another year or so) and then NOA1 (another year, plus it was pure luck I got another DL anyway, as the NOA1 is NOT stated as one of the proofs for DMV in Oklahoma to accept, and the instructor falsely marked it as an I551 stamp).
So there I will be - next year in May, hoping for my first 4 year DL (but only should I have my 10 year card then) - otherwise it will be another year with the I551 stamp in passport and DL# 4.
MichelleandCraig
Ahhhh, I see. That bites! sad.gif M.
Kazan' Tiger
Nice wishes to you to, geez! These forum is getting more and more rude lately.

QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 02:42 PM) *
Yeah, working illegally ("under the table") is the way to go. Too bad I don't work in any profession that would allow for that. And I've had only a total of 3 DL's now in the past 3 1/2 years, and it will expire again next year May.... that much for your utopia of DLs being good for 4 years. I hope you never get a rough awakening from your dreams.... Keep sleeping.
Kazan' Tiger
You do not know me or my situation. If I have a way to find under the table work for my fiancée that is hardly stupid. It's being resourceful. Excuse me all to Hell for thinking life is just a little to short to get all worked in a froth over delays. This is the govenment we are talking about and they have always worked at a snail's pace.

QUOTE(Germerican @ Dec 20 2007, 02:58 PM) *
I have to agree. The "plenty of ways to work under the table" comment is pretty stupid. Do you really want to go through all that trouble of obtaining a visa, only to have them sent your fiancée back when they catch her working illegally? If so, you might as well forget about the visa and just have her come over without a visa right away. (Disclaimer: This last comment is pure ironie!!!)

@tweety: I can understand your frustration and hope your case gets approved ASAP!
Parivar CSK
QUOTE(sarah and hicham @ Dec 20 2007, 12:44 PM) *
QUOTE(stina&suj @ Dec 20 2007, 07:07 AM) *
What annoys me is the biometrics game we have had to play with USCIS. We haven't even been able to move on from that point yet. We waited awhile to get a biometrics notice, then he went and got it done, then got another biometrics letter because his fingerprints didn't work...went again, and then got an RFE because they didn't work again. Now we had to send in a police report. So we aren't able to just sit back and wait yet, due to the fingerprint problem. So we are constantly dealing with USCIS so far, no just waiting around for it to happen. It seems every couple weeks we are getting a letter asking for something else and it's getting old! tongue.gif
If that part gets resolved, we are fine waiting for the approval. It just can get irritating because it reminds you how inconsistent USCIS service centers are. People who sent in their apps months after us, got their bio appt really fast and already got approved, while we are waiting in biometrics limbo. LOL SO it's hard not to get annoyed about it sometimes. And then there are those of us lucky to get transferred to CSC while many at TSC and others are waiting much much longer. It's the inconsistency of it all that's aggrevating.

Also Suj feels a little uncomfortable visiting India with only the receipt and stamp in his passport(which he'd have to get at our local office) and would much rather have the actual card before he visits India again so they don't question his status over in India.


This happened to us at the AOS stage. Man, what a pain! Good luck with the police report, it was really easy to get here and we picked it up the same day.


We got it easy too, and sent it out today! Hopefully that's good enough for them and we can move on.
Parivar CSK
If you are going to post about doing illegal things(working under the table), which is a sore spot for us Vjers, you are going to get some responses about it. My husband could have worked under the table when he first came, but why risk doing that? It's better to do things legally.

And I know you are still separated so it may be annoying to see people complain about the process after being together, but you aren't realizing a lot about it. Like that for some people it's effecting their daily lives. Yes they are very happy to be with their SOs, I am too, but when you are jumping through hoops you get a little tired from it. It's not just always sitting around doing nothing while waiting. They want this, they want that, your employer can give you a hard time, the DL issue can be complicated, even traveling, because your status is weird at this time. You have an expired GC and a letter saying you are legit, yet some focus on the expired GC and don't let you live your life, as seen from some examples here.

QUOTE(Kazan @ Dec 20 2007, 05:11 PM) *
Nice wishes to you to, geez! These forum is getting more and more rude lately.

QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 02:42 PM) *
Yeah, working illegally ("under the table") is the way to go. Too bad I don't work in any profession that would allow for that. And I've had only a total of 3 DL's now in the past 3 1/2 years, and it will expire again next year May.... that much for your utopia of DLs being good for 4 years. I hope you never get a rough awakening from your dreams.... Keep sleeping.

Germerican
QUOTE(Kazan @ Dec 20 2007, 04:19 PM) *
You do not know me or my situation. If I have a way to find under the table work for my fiancée that is hardly stupid. It's being resourceful. Excuse me all to Hell for thinking life is just a little to short to get all worked in a froth over delays. This is the govenment we are talking about and they have always worked at a snail's pace.



What does knowing you or your situation have to do with not condoning illegal actions? To be quite honest, you might as well tell me you are going to rob a bank to pay your taxes, after all it's the IRS who you are dealing with and that makes it okay. I would feel exactly the same about that situation as I feel about working illegally.

And by the way... I came over here on a K-1 and wasn't able to work for a long time. My wife had just finished college and had to support us on an entry level salary. That time really sucked but guess what, we had no other choice and had to wait for my work permit before I could financially contribute something. Luckily we knew this would happen before we applied for the K-1 and were able to save up a bit.
jsnearline
When my wife and I filed the I-751, I thought I'd be able to forget about it after she completed her biometrics. After all, no matter how long it takes for them to approve, it doesn't affect when she's eligbile for citizenship.

That said, we need that sense of closure. Once this is done, she doesn't have to do anything for ten years. Sure I'd love for her to become a citizen, but she should be able to choose whether to do that at a time of her choosing, rather than applying just to force a decision on the I-751.

On a side note, you'd be surprised how many people don't understand the extension letter, let alone a valid passport and green card. We had trouble flying Frontier Airlines to Canada last month because the agents thought since my wife's K1 had expired, that her green card must be expired too. sad.gif I can't imagine they'd let us fly if the green card was expired, even with an extension letter...

Kazan' Tiger
Robbing a bank is a bit different from working under the table, don't you think? The last time I looked, the police don't start chasing and shooting at you for working on a cash basis at a friend's business. There are many ways to work independently. No one said anything about not paying taxes.

QUOTE(Germerican @ Dec 20 2007, 07:13 PM) *
What does knowing you or your situation have to do with not condoning illegal actions? To be quite honest, you might as well tell me you are going to rob a bank to pay your taxes, after all it's the IRS who you are dealing with and that makes it okay. I would feel exactly the same about that situation as I feel about working illegally.

And by the way... I came over here on a K-1 and wasn't able to work for a long time. My wife had just finished college and had to support us on an entry level salary. That time really sucked but guess what, we had no other choice and had to wait for my work permit before I could financially contribute something. Luckily we knew this would happen before we applied for the K-1 and were able to save up a bit.
Germerican
QUOTE(Kazan @ Dec 20 2007, 07:59 PM) *
Robbing a bank is a bit different from working under the table, don't you think? The last time I looked, the police don't start chasing and shooting at you for working on a cash basis at a friend's business. There are many ways to work independently. No one said anything about not paying taxes.

QUOTE(Germerican @ Dec 20 2007, 07:13 PM) *
What does knowing you or your situation have to do with not condoning illegal actions? To be quite honest, you might as well tell me you are going to rob a bank to pay your taxes, after all it's the IRS who you are dealing with and that makes it okay. I would feel exactly the same about that situation as I feel about working illegally.

And by the way... I came over here on a K-1 and wasn't able to work for a long time. My wife had just finished college and had to support us on an entry level salary. That time really sucked but guess what, we had no other choice and had to wait for my work permit before I could financially contribute something. Luckily we knew this would happen before we applied for the K-1 and were able to save up a bit.



The point I was trying to make is that both is illegal. I don't think USCIS and ICE will come after you for helping out your friend, who in return hands you a couple of bucks, either. (Provided you don't help your friend 40 hours a week wink.gif) Even though I think helping a friend in exchange for money might be considered illegal as well, if you aren't authorized to work. However, you were basically hinting that you were going to let your fiancee work illegally and as a law-abiding permanent resident I just shrug when I hear something like that.

Anyway, I wish you the best of luck and hope everything works out for the two of you and you won't have to turn into Bonnie and Clyde! biggrin.gif
thea
QUOTE(Germerican @ Dec 20 2007, 01:07 PM) *
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 12:02 PM) *
QUOTE(Germerican @ Dec 20 2007, 11:59 AM) *
QUOTE(tweety @ Dec 20 2007, 11:45 AM) *
I just think it makes a huge difference if you already have the job, and the company wants something from you (i.e. valid GC), as opposed to when you are dealing with a prospective future employer. In the latter case you are undoubtedly in a way weaker position - as you want employment from them, while they still have a pool of candidates to fall back on, should you (the one with questionable papers) not be able to produce the desired papers on time.
You get the difference?


I do get the point, however, if you are able to provide proper documentation, like in burs' case, (proper documentation does not mean a GC, it can also be a valid DL and a SSC w/o annotation, or an expired conditional GC with NOA, etc.) and they don't hire you based on the fact that you can't show them a valid GC, than that is discrimination in my opinion.

If I was looking for a job and a prospective employer told me they wouldn't hire me because I can't provide a valid GC as proof of employment eligibility (an that's what it's all about), I would take that I-9 and throw it in their face. After all, you have to proof that you are authorized to work, not your immigration status.


Yeah, picking a fight with your future employer is a sure way to get hired.... and I doubt they would tell you that they didn't hire you because of your immigration status, of course they'd just pick something else... it's not like they're that stupid.


Most definately. Apparently that's what happened in burs' case. And yes, some employers are that stupid! After all some aren't even familiar with the I-9. A form that every new employee hast to fill out.

Why not pick a fight with a potential employer? Maybe it'll impress them to see how determined you are! wink.gif

whistling.gif so true... I did that when I ran into an employer who really wanted to hire me but insisted on a GC. I only had an EAD at the time... I lectured them and told them that this was discrimination. They finally gave in - but I wouldn't have been caught dead working for a company who is so ignorant of the laws (especially considering this was a regulatory affairs position). innocent.gif
Erica&Terry

Personally I think I was getting more frustrated with having to gather everything AGAIN (some or even most of which is the exact same crap they asked for with AOS and at least for us a lot of it hasn't changed...except adding in adoption decrees and birth certificates) to send AGAIN with another check we can't really afford to write in the middle of the holidays when we're both working full time and have 3 kids to keep up with when we're not working!

BUT, that being said, it does make me nervous sometimes to think that if some stick up his/her butt adjudicator is having a bad day when he/she sees our file, we might end up having to jump through still more hoops or risk having them start proceedings and, let me tell you, if that happens, that adjudicator will wish they were never born. If they even CONSIDER making me a single parent by sending Terry back, THEY will have me and my three children on THEIR doorstep (AT HOME) by whatever means I can find to stalk them and make their lives even more miserable than they already are and we will STAY THERE until they change their minds. Anyway, that is my one nagging fear...that it's in their hands to screw with our entire lives...and it's not just me and my husband anymore. There are three little ones who depend on him besides me to help keep us all going.
MichelleandCraig
LOL, Erica. I like you! smile.gif M.
rebeccajo
Besides that, it's a violation of the TOS to declare illegal intent on this site. Even though that intent to work illegally would be 'forgiven' by the service by virtue of marriage to a US Citizen, I hardly think it's a good idea to say 'oh well to hell with following the rules'.

Working under the table to pick up some spare change isn't quite equal, either, to someone being put off work from a career position they worked hard to obain after immigration simply because their employer is a nervous nellie about having an immigrant onboard.

This forum isn't harsher every day. You're just getting a reality check about life with a foreign born individual. Hearts, flowers and roses at the end of the waiting doesn't pay the bills or guarantee you eternal bliss. Somebody has to bake the biscuits, and it ain't gonna happen if you have your head up your rear-end thinking life will just take care of itself because you are reunited.

QUOTE(Germerican @ Dec 20 2007, 10:42 PM) *
QUOTE(Kazan @ Dec 20 2007, 07:59 PM) *
Robbing a bank is a bit different from working under the table, don't you think? The last time I looked, the police don't start chasing and shooting at you for working on a cash basis at a friend's business. There are many ways to work independently. No one said anything about not paying taxes.

QUOTE(Germerican @ Dec 20 2007, 07:13 PM) *
What does knowing you or your situation have to do with not condoning illegal actions? To be quite honest, you might as well tell me you are going to rob a bank to pay your taxes, after all it's the IRS who you are dealing with and that makes it okay. I would feel exactly the same about that situation as I feel about working illegally.

And by the way... I came over here on a K-1 and wasn't able to work for a long time. My wife had just finished college and had to support us on an entry level salary. That time really sucked but guess what, we had no other choice and had to wait for my work permit before I could financially contribute something. Luckily we knew this would happen before we applied for the K-1 and were able to save up a bit.



The point I was trying to make is that both is illegal. I don't think USCIS and ICE will come after you for helping out your friend, who in return hands you a couple of bucks, either. (Provided you don't help your friend 40 hours a week wink.gif) Even though I think helping a friend in exchange for money might be considered illegal as well, if you aren't authorized to work. However, you were basically hinting that you were going to let your fiancee work illegally and as a law-abiding permanent resident I just shrug when I hear something like that.

Anyway, I wish you the best of luck and hope everything works out for the two of you and you won't have to turn into Bonnie and Clyde! biggrin.gif

Spiderette
I agree with Erica, the annoying part is knowing that they have control over your life. I too have a 3 year old son and if they find something wrong with my application there is always the risk of them saying "go back to SA and refile" this could take 2 years being away from my child. (that is not a cheap flight) of course this is worst case scenario...

My application is legitimate, so I'm not worried, but being at their mercy does not sit well with me.

Also... in 2002 my F1 was approved here in the US. When I went home for vacation I had to "reapply" to get the VISA in my passport and I was DENIED - I was in tears and finally the guy made me get all kinds of paperwork together in order to be approved (luckily friends in the US were able to FedEx some of the required docs to me). In my 2 week visit I spent 3 full days at the Embassy.

In 2005 when I was applying for my AOS, the EAD was supposed to take 3 months, mine too 9 months (!!!!!) and as a result I lost my job at a top tier investment bank, I ALSO lost my insurance coverage... and of course... I was 3 months pregnant at the time!!! (luckily I could get coverage from my husbands company) the bank offered me a job once I received the new card, but I knew I'd only be there a few months before having Joshua.

I know you're not asking about the entire process... but they have the ability to really affect lives, and "the process" has affected my life... so the waiting is annoying because I never know what will happen this time... especially now that people who applied before me are being approved... who knows what is coming my way....

That's why the waiting annoys me....
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.