Okay...so I'm not the one responsible for pulling your post off-topic this time.
QUOTE(zhenya.shikarnov @ Dec 19 2007, 12:52 PM)

I find that difficult to believe for two reasons primarily, neither of which are authoritative - they're opinions formed by observation or discussion mainly... And, of course, I'm limited in knowledge to the Ivanovo region specifically.
1- The majority of the "infrastructure" we enjoy in the US was built up over the last 100 years. If the US government collapsed, at least the landscape would be littered with highways, well constructed building, plumbing infrastructure, hospitals that were once state of the art. The hospitals in Ivanovo have old beds, like those we see in WWII movies, with no privacy whatsoever for patients. No oxygen lines, no gas tubes, nothing except big rooms with 4-6 ratsy beds. Not even curtains. There are more x-ray machines in average US cities than there are in the whole Ivanovski Oblast. Is this the type of legacy infrastructure that would be left over from a system that supposedly rivaled the West as little as 20-25 years ago.
You need to understand that much of what we consider to be important was unimportant in the Soviet state. We consider it necessary for a hospital bed to be comfortable, and have all kinds of call buttons and motors to tilt it up/down/wherever. In Russia, a hospital bed was (and is) to lay in and get better. There is no need for all those extra comforts, and it's considered by both staff and patient to be an unnecessary expense. As for technology such as X-ray machines, once things like that break, you need to have money to replace them. You can't expect an X-ray machine to last 20 years without breaking. So if there's no money to replace it, then they do what they can without it. But there was a day when most hospitals had very modern equipment.
To address the big rooms full of patients with no privacy, you need to know something about the Russians. They don't have the same concept of privacy that we do. Even in pre-Soviet days, the "commune" was what most Russians grew up in. Small social groups where everyone knew everything about everyone else. It was only under Khrushchev that massive apartment buildings (called "Khrushchev flats") started to give anyone any kind of privacy at all, but even these apartments had thin walls, and usually were occupied by more than one family or generation. The Western concept of privacy is for the most part unimportant to Russians. In fact, you probably noticed during your time in Russia that the whole concept of "personal space" is out the window. Curtains around your hospital bed would seem ludicrous to most Russians.
QUOTE
2- Stories. I've also heard that people go to the hospital to die. But I've heard nothing from anybody in the past two years (including many proud Soviets), to indicate that the medical system of today is substantially worse than during the 80's. Nobody has said to me, "it wasn't like this in the USSR" as they often do on a wide variety of other topics. Actually, I am wrong - my language professor did once mention that Soviet medicine was great, but at the time she lived in Moscow (which, as I'm sure we all know, is practically a separate country in and of itself.
When I studied the USSR for the Navy (1987-1993), one of the biggest surprises to me was how much they invested in their social infrastructure. Lenin said "Communism is Soviet power plus the electrification of the entire country," and within a decade almost every home in the Soviet Union had electricity. They may not have had good plumbing (and still don't) but they had a light to read by at night. And when you consider the land mass of Russia, it makes the feat even more impressive. They were dead serious about their infrastructure.
I'm actually surprised that anyone is surprised by this. We poured as much or more of our resources into our military during the cold war, and yet we were also able to build up the social infrastructure we have today. Why is it so hard to believe the Soviets couldn't at least come close? I'm not saying that life was every bit as comfortable in the USSR as it is here, but it certainly wasn't the hell hole that many seem to think it was, or is. I'm also pretty amazed that your SO hasn't set you straight on a lot of this. Or maybe she's tried and you're dismissing it as national pride.
QUOTE
In all, I just find it hard to believe that a "super power" that didn't provide plumbing infrastructure to a large percentage of homes in a city as large as Ivanovo, could have really rivaled the West in anything other than military spending (the economics of which is a large part of the reason the Soviet Union collapsed).
For some reason, plumbing was never a priority. I don't know why, although perhaps it's because they never experienced the plagues that ravaged London and many parts of Europe.
QUOTE
They may have gotten to space first, and held the world in fear, but based on all I've seen and heard, people weren't a high priority -- and so I can't imagine that adequately caring for them would be either.
I would never defend Communism or the Soviet style of government. Communism destroyed so much of what Russia could have been, and its effects will still be felt long after I'm dead. But to be fair, it wasn't just the Soviets that the world lived in fear of. They lived in fear of both superpowers. But it doesn't change the facts that the USSR did provide excellent health care for its people, and what you are seeing now is a hollow shade of what was once a very good system. Disagree if you like, but it doesn't make it less true. Ask anyone in your fiancee's family who is older than 30 and they'll tell you the same thing.
I mean no offense, but many of your conceptions of what Russia was and is seems to be based on conjecture and secondhand. You might want to hit the library and start really learning about your SO's homeland. It is a rich and wonderful place, and if you approach it with an open mind you'll realize that not only is life not backwards and primitive, but there are many aspects that are better.